AI Article Synopsis

  • The Mammography Quality Standards Act mandates audits of mammography facilities, but lacks specific metrics for evaluation, prompting a study on quality benchmark compliance.
  • Researchers analyzed data from 114 breast cancer screening facilities in Illinois over five years to assess trends in meeting quality benchmarks through participation in a quality improvement program.
  • Results showed increased compliance with various benchmarks, particularly in cancer detection and timeliness of care, indicating that continued participation in the program positively impacted the quality of mammography services.

Article Abstract

Purpose: The Mammography Quality Standards Act requires that mammography facilities conduct audits, but there are no specifications on the metrics to be measured. In a previous mammography quality improvement project, the authors examined whether breast cancer screening facilities could collect the data necessary to show that they met certain quality benchmarks. Here the authors present trends from the first 5 years of data collection to examine whether continued participation in this quality improvement program was associated with an increase in the number of benchmarks met for breast cancer screening.

Methods: Participating facilities across the state of Illinois (n = 114) with at least two time points of data collected (2006, 2009, 2010, 2011, and/or 2013) were included. Facilities provided aggregate data on screening mammographic examinations and corresponding diagnostic follow-up information, which was used to estimate 13 measures and corresponding benchmarks for patient tracking, callback, cancer detection, loss to follow-up, and timeliness of care.

Results: The number of facilities able to show that they met specific benchmarks increased with length of participation for many but not all measures. Trends toward meeting more benchmarks were apparent for cancer detection, timely imaging, not lost at biopsy, known minimal status (P < .01 for all), and proportion of screening-detected cancers that were minimal and early stage (P < .001 for both).

Conclusions: Participation in the quality improvement program seemed to lead to improvements in patient tracking, callback and detection, and timeliness benchmarks.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035910PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2020.07.019DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

participation quality
12
mammography quality
12
breast cancer
12
quality improvement
12
quality standards
8
improvement program
8
patient tracking
8
tracking callback
8
cancer detection
8
quality
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!