Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Recently, triglyceride rich lipoproteins are proposed to contribute to CAD risk; its concentrations would be partly determined by lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and endothelial lipase (EL). Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), a visceral AT surrounding myocardium and coronary arteries, emerged as an important actor in CAD; the increase in its volume could be a consequence of LPL and EL. Circulating enzymes levels would be conditioned by local tissue factors. Our aim was to evaluate LPL, EL and their regulators levels in serum and EAT from CAD patients, searching for possible parallelisms and their role in the lipoprotein profile.
Methods: In serum, EAT and subcutaneous AT (SAT) from patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG, n = 25) or valve replacement (No CABG, n = 25), LPL, EL and glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored high density lipoprotein-binding protein-1 (GPIHBP1) expression were evaluated. Besides, Apoprotein (Apo)CII, CIII and AV were determined in serum, along with lipoprotein profile.
Results: Insulin-resistance markers were higher in CABG (p < 0.05). Serum LPL levels were decreased (p = 0.045), while EL levels increased (p < 0.001) in CABG, without differences in EAT or SAT. Circulating GPIHBP1 concentrations were decreased in CABG (p = 0.047), while EAT GPIHBP1 expression was increased (p < 0.001). ApoCII and ApoAV concentrations were higher in CABG (p = 0.016 and p = 0.047, respectively), without differences in ApoCIII concentrations between groups.
Conclusions: In EAT, LPL and EL protein levels were not changed in CAD, although GPIHBP1 protein levels were higher. EAT would be a minor contributor to the circulating levels of the enzymes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.08.001 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!