Background: Prosthetic feet are available in a range of stiffness categories, however, there is limited evidence to guide optimal selection during prosthetic foot prescription. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of commercial prosthetic foot stiffness category on foot-ankle biomechanics, gait symmetry, community ambulation, and relative foot stiffness perception.
Methods: Participants were fit in randomized order with three consecutive stiffness categories of a commonly-prescribed prosthetic foot. Prosthetic foot roll-over shape and ankle push-off power and work were determined via data collected during walking in a motion analysis laboratory. Step activity was recorded during community use of each foot. Self-reported perception of relative foot stiffness was assessed with an ad hoc survey.
Findings: Seventeen males with transtibial amputation completed the study. Prosthetic foot roll-over radius increased with increased prosthetic foot stiffness categories (p < 0.001). Both prosthetic ankle push-off peak power and work decreased with increased foot stiffness categories (p = 0.002). There was no association between prosthetic foot stiffness category and step length symmetry or steps per day. When assessed post-accommodation, there was no association between relative foot stiffness perception and the stiffness category across prosthetic foot conditions.
Interpretation: Prosthetic foot stiffness category was significantly associated with changes in prosthetic foot-ankle biomechanical variables, however, was not associated with changes in gait symmetry or community ambulation. Relative prosthetic foot stiffness perception after accommodation was generally inconsistent with the order of prosthetic foot stiffness categories.
Clinical Relevance: While there were quantifiable differences in prosthetic foot-ankle biomechanics across stiffness categories, no significant differences were detected in gait symmetry or mean daily step count in the community. Furthermore, after community use, participants perceptions of relative stiffness across feet were generally inconsistent with the order of prosthetic foot stiffness categories. These findings raise questions as to whether changes in commercial prosthetic foot stiffness category (within a clinically relevant range) affect subjective and objective measures relevant to successful outcomes from prosthetic foot prescription.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105141 | DOI Listing |
Clin Orthop Relat Res
January 2025
Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Background: Many patients with a lower limb socket-suspended prothesis experience socket-related problems, such as pain, chronic skin conditions, and mechanical problems, and as a result, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is often negatively affected. A bone-anchored prosthesis can overcome these problems and improve HRQoL, but these prostheses have potential downsides as well. A valid and reliable tool to assess potential candidates for surgery concerning a favorable risk-benefit ratio between potential complications related to bone-anchored prostheses and improvements in HRQoL is not available yet.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Women veterans represent a growing number of veterans with limb loss who receive Veterans Health Administration treatment. This study surveyed a large sample of veterans about their satisfaction with prosthetic-related care and sought to understand how women veterans with limb loss rate their satisfaction with prostheses and care.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, mixed-mode survey of 46,614 veterans with major upper or lower limb amputation or partial foot amputation to assess amputation type, prosthesis use intensity, satisfaction with prostheses and services, and quality of life.
Disabil Rehabil
January 2025
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA.
Purpose: To evaluate the psychometric properties of performance and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for custom ankle-foot orthosis (AFOs) users.
Materials And Methods: Current AFO users completed two assessments one week apart; new AFO users completed an assessment before device delivery and at one- and two-months post-delivery.
Results: Seventy current and 31 new users consented and provided data.
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol
January 2025
Department of Arthritis Clinic and Research Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China. Electronic address:
The past several decades have seen significant advancements in joint replacement surgery for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Joint replacement procedures have become vital options for patients with severe joint damage and functional impairment. There has been an increased emphasis on personalized surgical strategies that tailor joint replacement decisions based on a patient's unique clinical characteristics and the extent of joint damage.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGait Posture
January 2025
Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Research and Development, Military Rehabilitation Centre Aardenburg, Doorn, the Netherlands.
Background: The alignment of a bone-anchored prosthesis has consequences for the external moments around the residual joints and implant, and these external moments can lead to serious negative long-term effects. A clear understanding of the relationship between transtibial prosthetic alignment and external joint and implant moment for bone-anchored prosthetic users is still lacking.
Research Question: What is the effect of systematic frontal plane prosthetic alignment changes on lower limb external joint moments in people with a transtibial bone-anchored prosthesis?
Methods: Participants underwent gait analysis on an instrumented dual belt treadmill.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!