National trends and outcomes of inpatient robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Surgery

Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), Division of Cardiac Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, CA. Electronic address:

Published: October 2020

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has reached nearly universal adoption in the management of gallstone-related disease. With advances in operative technology, robotic-assisted cholecystectomy has been used increasingly in many practices, but few studies have examined the adoption of robotic assistance for inpatient cholecystectomy and the temporal outcomes on a national scale. The present study aimed to identify trends in utilization, as well as outcomes and factors associated with the use of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy.

Methods: The 2008 to 2017 database of the National Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients undergoing inpatient cholecystectomy. Independent predictors of the use of robotic assistance for cholecystectomy were identified using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics.

Results: Of an estimated 3,193,697 patients undergoing cholecystectomy, 98.7% underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 1.3% robotic-assisted cholecystectomy. Rates of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy increased from 0.02% in 2008 to 3.2% in 2017 (nptrend < .001). Compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy, patients undergoing robotic-assisted cholecystectomy had a greater burden of comorbidities as measured by the Elixhauser index (2.2 vs 1.9, P < .001). Although mortality rates were similar, robotic-assisted cholecystectomy was associated with greater complication rates (15.5% vs 11.7%, P < .001), most notably gastrointestinal-related complications (3.7% vs 1.5%, P < .001). On multivariable regression, robotic-assisted cholecystectomy was associated with increased costs of hospitalization (β: $2,398, P < .001).

Conclusion: Using the largest national database available, we found a dramatic increase in the use of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy with no difference in mortality or duration of hospital stay, but there was a statistically significant increase in complications and costs. These findings warrant further investigation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2020.06.018DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

robotic-assisted cholecystectomy
28
laparoscopic cholecystectomy
16
cholecystectomy
15
patients undergoing
12
robotic-assisted
9
robotic assistance
8
inpatient cholecystectomy
8
rates robotic-assisted
8
cholecystectomy associated
8
national
4

Similar Publications

Evolution of minimally invasive cholecystectomy: a narrative review.

BMC Surg

November 2024

Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, being a prevalent abdominal surgical procedure, has transitioned through various innovative stages aimed at reducing the procedure's invasiveness. These stages encompass Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC), Mini Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (MLC), Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES), and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (RALC). The purpose of this review is to trace the evolution of minimally invasive cholecystectomy techniques, assess their status, and identify emerging trends and challenges in the field.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM) is a congenital anomaly where the pancreatic and bile ducts join outside the duodenal wall, resulting in formation of an elongated common channel. In normal physiology, the sphincter of Oddi regulates the junction between the pancreatic and bile ducts. Individuals with PBM lack this regulatory mechanism resulting in reflux of pancreatic juices into the biliary tract.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The Hugo™ Robotic-Assisted Surgery (RAS) System is an emergent device in the robotic surgery field. This study aims to describe the first general surgery-focused clinical study in Korea using the novel Hugo™ RAS System.

Methods: This study was a prospective, single-center, single-arm, confirmatory clinical study conducted at Seoul National University Hospital where 20 cholecystectomies were performed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cholecystectomy.

Surg Clin North Am

December 2024

Department of Surgery, Logan Health, 1333 Surgical Services Drive, Kalispell, MT 59901, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • The article focuses on preoperative clinical evaluation, diagnostic considerations, and the selection of antibiotics before surgery.
  • It covers the operative planning process, emphasizing how patient characteristics and disease conditions guide the choice of surgical approaches, including laparoscopic and robotic-assisted techniques.
  • The text also details postoperative care, addressing common complications and how to manage them effectively.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Lap-C) is the standard of care for patients requiring cholecystectomy in the acute setting. Although robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RA-C) performance has increased, utilization in the acute setting has not been widely reported. We describe the feasibility of RA-C for pediatric patients undergoing acute inpatient cholecystectomy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!