AI Article Synopsis

  • This study focuses on the effectiveness and cost-efficiency of combining Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) with Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for treating patients with both PTSD and Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD), compared to EMDR alone.
  • It will be conducted as a randomized controlled trial with 126 adult participants, measuring various neurobiological factors (like cortisol and protein levels) to understand how they influence an individual's response to treatment.
  • This research aims to identify which therapy is more effective for specific patients and establish better treatment protocols for those with the complex comorbidity of PTSD and BPD.

Article Abstract

Background: Comorbidity between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is high. There is growing motivation among clinicians to offer PTSD treatments - such as Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) - to patients with PTSD and comorbid BPD. However, a large subgroup with comorbid BPD does not sufficiently respond to PTSD treatment and is more likely to be excluded or to dropout from treatment. Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) for BPD is well established and although there is some evidence that DBT combined with DBT Prolonged Exposure (DBT + DBT PE) is twice as effective in reducing PTSD symptoms than DBT alone, the comparative efficacy of integrated PTSD-DBT and PTSD-only treatment has not been investigated yet. The current study will therefore evaluate the comparative clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of EMDR-DBT and EMDR-only in patients with PTSD and comorbid (sub)clinical BPD. Moreover, it is not clear yet what treatment works best for which individual patient. The current study will therefore evaluate neurobiological predictors and mediators of the individual response to treatment.

Method: A randomized controlled trial comparing the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of integrated EMDR-DBT (n = 63) and EMDR-only (n = 63) in treatment-seeking adult patients with PTSD and comorbid (sub)clinical BPD. In addition, neurobiological predictors and mediators of treatment outcome, such as hair cortisol, FKBP5 and BDNF protein levels and FKBP5 and BDNF methylation status, are measured through hair and blood samples.

Discussion: This is the first study to compare the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of integrated EMDR-DBT and EMDR-only in patients with PTSD and comorbid (sub)clinical BPD, while simultaneously identifying individual predictors and mediators of treatment response. Results will reveal which treatment works best for which individual patient, thereby guiding individual treatment choices and personalizing psychiatry.

Trial Registration: Clinical Trials, NCT03833453 . Retrospectively registered, 15 March 2019.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409691PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02713-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical efficacy
16
efficacy cost-effectiveness
16
comorbid subclinical
16
patients ptsd
16
ptsd comorbid
16
subclinical bpd
12
predictors mediators
12
treatment
9
randomized controlled
8
controlled trial
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!