Higher dominance rank is associated with lower glucocorticoids in wild female baboons: A rank metric comparison.

Horm Behav

Department of Biology, Duke University, 130 Science Drive, Durham, NC 27708, USA,; Institute of Primate Research, National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi 00502, Kenya,; Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, 130 Science Drive, Durham, NC 27708, USA. Electronic address:

Published: September 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study investigates how glucocorticoid levels, which indicate stress, vary among female baboons based on their social dominance rank, utilizing over 14,000 fecal samples.
  • - High-ranking female baboons are expected to have lower stress levels, and the research found that alpha females had significantly lower glucocorticoid concentrations compared to lower-ranking females, confirming part of the hypothesis.
  • - Different methods of measuring dominance rank (such as ordinal rank and Elo rating) were tested, revealing that using only alpha status can oversimplify the relationship between rank and stress, while also highlighting the complexities of female social competition.

Article Abstract

In vertebrates, glucocorticoid secretion occurs in response to energetic and psychosocial stressors that trigger the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Measuring glucocorticoid concentrations can therefore shed light on the stressors associated with different social and environmental variables, including dominance rank. Using 14,172 fecal samples from 237 wild female baboons, we test the hypothesis that high-ranking females experience fewer psychosocial and/or energetic stressors than lower-ranking females. We predicted that high-ranking females would have lower fecal glucocorticoid (fGC) concentrations than low-ranking females. Because dominance rank can be measured in multiple ways, we employ an information theoretic approach to compare 5 different measures of rank as predictors of fGC concentrations: ordinal rank; proportional rank; Elo rating; and two approaches to categorical ranking (alpha vs non-alpha and high-middle-low). Our hypothesis was supported, but it was also too simplistic. We found that alpha females exhibited substantially lower fGCs than other females (typical reduction = 8.2%). If we used proportional rank instead of alpha versus non-alpha status in the model, we observed a weak effect of rank such that fGCs rose 4.2% from the highest- to lowest-ranking female in the hierarchy. Models using ordinal rank, Elo rating, or high-middle-low categories alone failed to explain variation in female fGCs. Our findings shed new light on the association between dominance rank and the stress response, the competitive landscape of female baboons as compared to males, and the assumptions inherent in a researcher's choice of rank metric.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7541639PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2020.104826DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dominance rank
16
rank
12
female baboons
12
wild female
8
rank metric
8
high-ranking females
8
fgc concentrations
8
ordinal rank
8
proportional rank
8
rank elo
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!