Introduction: Unilateral posterior crossbite (UPCB), often from dysfunctional and para-functional causes, leads to positional mandibular asymmetries that can develop at a very young age into skeletal mandibular deviation; hence the interest of early maxillary expansion. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the impact of maxillary expansion by Quad Helix (QH) on mandibular skeletal asymmetry correction before and after 7 years of age.
Materials And Methods: All children with UPCB and skeletal mandibular asymmetry, who were treated by QH in the orthodontic department of Montpellier between February 2017 and August 2018 and had a radiography file at baseline (T0) and 12 months later (T1) were retrospectively included. The patients were divided into two groups according to age: under 7 years of age with QH adjusted on second primary molars (early group G1) and over up to 13 years old with QH adjusted on first permanent molars (late group G2). The differences between the right and left sides of the mandible in corpus length ΔL (main eligibility criterion) and ramus height ΔH (secondary criterion) were compared between groups. X test, Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for baseline comparisons. A multifactorial analysis allowing adjustment on possible confounding factors was used with R software.
Results: Out of 67 patients files only 40 were completed and analysed: 13 in G1 and 27 in G2. These groups were comparable at baseline except for the age parameter. Taking into account the initial severity of asymmetry, the analysis of covariance showed a significant intergroup difference with higher correction in the early group of the corpus asymmetry (+1.0; P=0.008). On the contrary, no significant differences were observed between the groups in the ramus asymmetry correction.
Conclusions: Within the limits of this retrospective study, the early unilateral posterior occlusion correction by QH can better reduce both positional and contour mandibular asymmetries in patients under 7 years of age.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2020.06.009 | DOI Listing |
Nanoscale Adv
December 2024
Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta 11227 Saskatchewan Drive Edmonton Alberta T6G 2G2 Canada.
Self-assembly of small molecules into supramolecular architectures is a sustainable alternative to new advanced material design. Herein, the design and synthesis of a self-assembling system containing four covalently linked hybrid guanine and cytosine (G∧C) units that were connected through bifunctional amines are reported. These tetra G∧C motifs were characterized and self-assembled in water and methanol to produce discrete nanostructures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFChildren (Basel)
October 2024
Department of Health Sciences, Unicamillus-Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Via di Sant'Alessandro, 8, 00131 Rome, Italy.
Background: The aim of the present study was to compare the vertical dimension changes, before and after treatment, in two groups of growing patients, one group treated with clear aligner therapy versus a group treated with Quad-helix and bite-block therapy.
Methods: The studied sample was composed of n. 40 patients (20 females and 20 males with a mean age of 8.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent
July 2024
Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Goa Dental College & Hospital, Bambolim, Goa, India.
Aim And Background: The quad helix is well known for its ability to treat posterior crossbites in children with maxillary deficiency. A few authors have also used it for the treatment of unilateral crossbite due to unilateral maxillary deficiency by incorporating modifications in the appliance. The aim was to treat a unilateral crossbite using a newly modified quad helix.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjectives: To assess skeletal and dental effects and evaluate possible side effects of maxillary expansion with two different appliances, directly after expansion and 1 year postexpansion.
Materials And Methods: Forty-two patients with unilateral posterior crossbite (mean 9.5 ± 0.
Cureus
July 2024
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
This case report presents an orthodontic treatment approach involving retained deciduous teeth. The patient presented with a Class I malocclusion and buccal crossbite. Despite the presence of retained deciduous teeth, a non-extraction treatment plan was devised to address the malocclusion and achieve optimal dental alignment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!