Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the maxillary mesiodistal dental angulations of Class II malocclusion patients treated with the Jones Jig, followed by fixed appliances, with normal values of a historical control group, on panoramic radiographs.

Material And Methods: The sample comprised 80 panoramic radiographs of 40 patients divided into two groups. Eligibility criteria included patients with predominantly dental Class II malocclusion; the presence of all teeth up to the second molars and no previous orthodontic treatment. The experimental group was composed of 60 radiographs of 20 patients treated with the Jones Jig distalizer followed by fixed appliances. The radiographs were taken at pre-treatment (T0), post-distalization (T1), and post-treatment (T2). The historical control group comprised 20 radiographs of 20 subjects with untreated normal occlusion. The mesiodistal axial angulations of all maxillary erupted teeth were evaluated with the Dolphin Imaging software. Intragroup comparisons in the experimental group were performed with repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey tests. The experimental group at T2 versus the control group were compared with t tests.

Results: After distalization, significant distal angulation of the molars (110.58°±8.54, P<0.000) and mesial angulation of the second (86.43°±8.08, P<0.000) and first premolars (80.11°±8.01, P<0.000) was observed. However, this was corrected after comprehensive fixed orthodontics (100.54°±6.53; 98.95°±7.00; 94.92°±6.44; P<0.000, for these teeth, respectively). Intergroup comparisons resulted in first molars, premolars, canines, and central incisors significantly more distally angulated in the experimental group, when compared to the control.

Conclusions: In general, at the end of orthodontic treatment, patients treated with the Jones Jig distalizer followed by fixed appliances presented more distally angulated maxillary teeth when compared to an untreated group with normal occlusion.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2020.06.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

jones jig
12
fixed appliances
12
control group
12
experimental group
12
angulations class
8
jig fixed
8
class malocclusion
8
patients treated
8
treated jones
8
historical control
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the mechanical properties of metacarpal long oblique and transverse shaft fractures stabilized by threaded intramedullary nails and dorsal plates and screws.

Methods: Transverse and oblique midshaft osteotomies were created in 28 paired left and right metacarpal bones from four fresh frozen cadavers. Each matched pair was fixed with one 4.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To assess the incidence of transcortical fracture (TCF) development based on screw insertion angle and screw insertion speed.

Study Design: Cadaveric experimental study.

Sample Population: Sixty-six canine tibiae.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To compare the maxillary dentoalveolar changes of patients treated with three distalization force systems: Jones Jig, Distal Jet and First Class appliances, using digitized models.

Material And Methods: The retrospective sample comprised 118 digitized models of 59 patients with Class II malocclusion divided into three groups: Group 1 consisted of 22 patients treated with the Jones Jig appliance; Group 2 consisted of 20 patients treated with the Distal Jet, and Group 3 comprised 17 patients treated with the First Class appliance. Pretreatment and post-distalization plaster models of all patients were digitized and evaluated with OrthoAnalyzerTM software.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the long-term stability of Class II correction with the Pendulum or Jones jig followed by fixed appliances.

Settings And Sample Population: Group 1 comprised 20 Class II malocclusion patients with a mean initial age of 13.97 years (SD = 1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the maxillary mesiodistal dental angulations of Class II malocclusion patients treated with the Jones Jig, followed by fixed appliances, with normal values of a historical control group, on panoramic radiographs.

Material And Methods: The sample comprised 80 panoramic radiographs of 40 patients divided into two groups. Eligibility criteria included patients with predominantly dental Class II malocclusion; the presence of all teeth up to the second molars and no previous orthodontic treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!