Human adults rely on both acoustic and linguistic information to identify adult talkers. Assuming favorable conditions, adult listeners recognize other adults fairly accurately and quickly. But how well can adult listeners recognize child talkers, whose speech productions often differ dramatically from adult speech productions? Although adult talker recognition has been heavily studied, only one study to date has directly compared the recognition of unfamiliar adult and child talkers [Creel and Jimenez (2012). J. Exp. Child Psychol. 113(4), 487-509]. Therefore, the current study revisits this question with a much larger and younger sample of child talkers (N = 20); performance with adult talkers (N = 20) was also tested to provide a baseline. In Experiment 1, adults successfully distinguished between adult talkers in an AX discrimination task but performed much worse with child talkers. In Experiment 2, adults were slower and less accurate at learning to identify child talkers than adult talkers in a training-identification task. Finally, in Experiment 3, adults failed to improve at identifying child talkers after three days of training with numerous child voices. Taken together, these findings reveal a sizable difference in adults' ability to recognize child versus adult talkers. Possible explanations and implications for understanding human talker recognition are discussed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/10.0001576 | DOI Listing |
J Speech Lang Hear Res
January 2025
Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine if the Vocabulary Acquisition and Usage for Late Talkers (VAULT) intervention could be efficaciously applied to a new treatment target: words a child neither understood nor said. We also assessed whether the type of context variability used to encourage semantic learning (i.e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Speech Lang Hear Res
January 2025
Research Unit of Language and Communication, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, TU Dortmund University, Germany.
Purpose: Prior work has found that "late talkers" (LTs) as a group continue to demonstrate lower language and reading outcomes compared to their typically developing (TD) peers even into young adulthood. Others identified that children diagnosed with developmental language disorder (DLD) show difficulties later with theory of mind (ToM) tasks and metaphor comprehension, but there is a shortage of research specifically investigating these advanced skills in LTs. The current study therefore compared language-related skills of former LTs with their TD peers at school age.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAtten Percept Psychophys
January 2025
School of Allied Health and Communicative Disorders, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA.
Speechreading-gathering speech information from talkers' faces-supports speech perception when speech acoustics are degraded. Benefitting from speechreading, however, requires listeners to visually fixate talkers during face-to-face interactions. The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that preschool-aged children allocate their eye gaze to a talker when speech acoustics are degraded.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLang Speech
January 2025
Department of Educational Psychology, Leadership, & Counseling, Texas Tech University, USA.
Adapting one's speaking style is particularly crucial as children start interacting with diverse conversational partners in various communication contexts. The study investigated the capacity of preschool children aged 3-5 years ( = 28) to modify their speaking styles in response to background noise, referred to as noise-adapted speech, and when talking to an interlocutor who pretended to have hearing loss, referred to as clear speech. We examined how two modified speaking styles differed across the age range.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Speech Lang Pathol
January 2025
Charles Sturt University, Australia.
Purpose: To explore caregivers' experiences and engagement during the 16-week designed to support late talkers.
Method: Qualitative interpretative description methodology was used to understand the experience of five caregivers who had completed to support their children (aged 18-36 months). Caregivers attended a focus group to share their perspectives.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!