Surgeons Underestimate the Importance of Surgical Topics for Non-Surgeons: Results of a National Survey.

Objective: To determine if surgeons and non-surgeons agree on the importance of surgical topics covered in the surgical clerkship to the daily practice of non-surgeons.

Design: An IRB-approved anonymous survey ranking the relative importance of 35 topics drawn from surgical clerkship curricula asking physicians to rank the relative importance of each topic, using a five-point Likert scale, to the daily practice of non-surgeons.

Setting: Online anonymous survey.

Participants: Convenience sample of practicing physicians and trainees. The survey was offered to physicians in all specialties via social media and professional connections, responders identified their practice specialty.

Results: 295 physicians completed the survey. Two hundred thirty-one (85%) were from non-surgical specialties: emergency medicine (EM, n = 100); primary care (PC, n = 71 - included internal medicine, family medicine, and pediatrics); a variety of others (n = 60).  Surgeons and non-surgeons agreed on the relative importance of the acute abdomen, breast disease, inguinal hernias, inflammatory bowel disease, morbid obesity, sinusitis, thyroid and parathyroid disease, and wound care; surgeons believed colorectal cancer and diverticulitis to be more important. Surgeons rated all other topics as less important to non-surgeons than non-surgeons. EM rated most acute problems more important that PC; both groups ranked most topics higher importance to the practice of a non-surgeon than surgeons (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Surgeons consistently underestimate the importance non-surgeons place on surgical topics in their practice.  These results reinforce the perceived importance of a wide exposure to surgery in the surgical clerkship to all medical students - but topics could be focused differently depending on acute or non-acute non-surgical care career plans.