AI Article Synopsis

  • Delay-and-sum (DAS) beamforming struggles with high-density scatterer detection, leading to overlapping point spread functions that complicate identification.
  • A convolutional neural network (CNN) was developed to process radio frequency channel data and create non-overlapping Gaussian confidence maps, effectively localizing scatterers even beyond DAS resolution limits.
  • In tests with simulated and measured data, the CNN achieved high precision and recall rates, showing promise for applications like better detection of microbubbles in super-resolution ultrasound imaging.

Article Abstract

Delay-and-sum (DAS) beamforming is unable to identify individual scatterers when their density is so high that their point spread functions overlap. This paper proposes a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based method to detect and localize high-density scatterers, some of which are closer than the resolution limit of delay-and-sum (DAS) beamforming. A CNN was designed to take radio frequency channel data and return non-overlapping Gaussian confidence maps. The scatterer positions were estimated from the confidence maps by identifying local maxima. On simulated test sets, the CNN method with three plane waves achieved a precision of 1.00 and a recall of 0.91. Localization uncertainties after excluding outliers were ±46 [Formula: see text] (outlier ratio: 4%) laterally and ±26 [Formula: see text] (outlier ratio: 1%) axially. To evaluate the proposed method on measured data, two phantoms containing cavities were 3-D printed and imaged. For the phantom study, the training data were modified according to the physical properties of the phantoms and a new CNN was trained. On an uniformly spaced scatterer phantom, a precision of 0.98 and a recall of 1.00 were achieved with the localization uncertainties of ±101 [Formula: see text] (outlier ratio: 1%) laterally and ±37 [Formula: see text] (outlier ratio: 1%) axially. On a randomly spaced scatterer phantom, a precision of 0.59 and a recall of 0.63 were achieved. The localization uncertainties were ±132 [Formula: see text] (outlier ratio: 0%) laterally and ±44 [Formula: see text] with a bias of 22 [Formula: see text] (outlier ratio: 0%) axially. This method can potentially be extended to detect highly concentrated microbubbles in order to shorten data acquisition times of super-resolution ultrasound imaging.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2020.3006445DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

[formula text]
28
text] outlier
24
outlier ratio
24
localization uncertainties
12
ratio laterally
12
ratio axially
12
convolutional neural
8
delay-and-sum das
8
das beamforming
8
confidence maps
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!