Evaluating Factors Contributing to Dropout in a Large Peritoneal Dialysis Program.

Am J Med Sci

Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in New Orleans - Section of Nephrology and Hypertension, School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana. Electronic address:

Published: January 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examines why patients are more likely to drop out of peritoneal dialysis (PD) compared to hemodialysis (HD), focusing on those who withdrew between 2016 and 2018.
  • Out of 83 patients in the PD program, 27 dropped out, with the majority (24) attributed to controllable factors, mainly psychosocial issues, which accounted for a significant 63% of the controllable losses.
  • The results suggest that psychosocial factors are the leading cause of dropout, affecting both early and late treatment exit, regardless of how patients began therapy, highlighting the need for improved support systems for PD patients.

Article Abstract

Background: The low prevalence of peritoneal dialysis (PD) (9%) vs. hemodialysis (HD) (88.2%) is partly due to patient dropout from therapy.

Methods: This retrospective study identified patients who withdrew from PD between 2016 and 2018 in our program. We evaluated all other factors as controllable losses. Analysis included time on therapy at dropout (very early, early or late) and method of initiation (HD to PD conversion, unplanned PD, or planned start).

Results: Eighty-three patients enrolled into our PD program. 27 dropped out; 24 were due to controllable factors, 3 due to death, with a median age at dropout of 52 years old. We determined psychosocial factors (PF) to be the largest controllable factor influencing dropout; contributing a 63% rate among all controllable factors. When considering time until dropout, 100% of very early dropout patients and 50% of late dropout patients did so due to PF. Among early dropout patients 67% dropped out due to other medical reasons. The mean time to dropout for PF, other, and infection (INF) were 13, 26, and 33 months, respectively. When considering type of initiation, we found PF to be the largest attributable factor with 50% of unplanned, 100% of planned, and 50% of conversions stopping therapy.

Conclusions: Our study indicates that the primary reason for controllable loss from therapy was secondary to PF regardless of the time on therapy or the method of initiation to therapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2020.06.030DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dropout patients
12
dropout
10
peritoneal dialysis
8
time therapy
8
method initiation
8
controllable factors
8
time dropout
8
early dropout
8
patients
5
controllable
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!