AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compared three nomograms that predict how well patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) based on their axillary lymph nodes.
  • The analysis involved 581 patients, revealing that 43.5% achieved a pathologic node-negative (ypN0) status, with significant variation by cancer subtype.
  • While all three models (Mayo and MD Anderson Cancer Center models) had comparable overall discrimination, the Mayo model had better sensitivity for identifying ypN+ patients, but the MDACC models showed higher specificity for ypN0 status in certain subtypes, particularly not performing well for the ER+/HER2- group.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Prediction models are useful to guide decision making. Our goal was to compare three published nomograms predicting axillary response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), clinically node-positive breast cancer.

Methods: Patients with cT1-T4, cN1-N3 breast cancer treated with NAC and surgery from 2008 to 2019 were reviewed. The predicted probability of pathologic node-negative (ypN0) status was estimated for each nomogram. Area under the curve (AUC) was compared across models, overall and by biologic subtype.

Results: Of 581 patients, 253 (43.5%) were ypN0. ypN0 status varied by subtype: 23.9% for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), 68.9% for HER2-positive (HER2+), and 47.2% for ER-negative (ER-)/HER2-. The three nomograms had similar AUC values (0.761-0.769; p = 0.80). The Mayo model-predicted probability was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than the observed probability of ypN0 status, while the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) 1- and 2-predicted probabilities were similar to the observed probability. At a predicted probability threshold of 50%, the Mayo model had the highest sensitivity (89.6%) for detecting ypN+ patients compared with MDACC models 1 and 2 (76.5%; p < 0.001). However, both MDACC models had higher specificity in identifying ypN0 status among HER2+ (81.7%) and ER-/HER2- (75.9-77.6%) patients compared with the Mayo model (59.5% and 43.1%; each p < 0.001). None of the models identified the ER+/HER2- patients with ypN0 status well at the ≥ 50% threshold (specificity 0-9.4%).

Conclusion: All three models predicting nodal response to NAC performed well overall with respect to discrimination, but differed with respect to calibration and performance at a 50% probability threshold. However, none of the models performed well at the 50% threshold for ER+/HER2- patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08885-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinically node-positive
8
node-positive breast
8
breast cancer
8
cancer treated
8
neoadjuvant chemotherapy
8
ypn0 status
8
performance clinical
4
clinical utility
4
utility models
4
models predicting
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!