Aims/hypothesis: Metformin is the only approved oral agent for youth with type 2 diabetes but its mechanism of action remains controversial. Recent data in adults suggest a primary role for the enteroinsular pathway, but there are no data in youth, in whom metformin efficacy is only ~50%. Our objectives were to compare incretin concentrations and rates of glucose production and gluconeogenesis in youth with type 2 diabetes before and after short-term metformin therapy compared with peers with normal glucose tolerance (NGT).
Methods: This is a case-control observational study in youth with type 2 diabetes who were not on metformin (n = 18) compared with youth with NGT (n = 10) who were evaluated with a 2 day protocol. A 75 g OGTT was administered to measure intact glucagon-like 1 peptide (iGLP-1), gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and peptide YY (PYY). Insulinogenic index (IGI) and whole-body insulin sensitivity were calculated using glucose and insulin levels from the OGTT. Basal rates of gluconeogenesis (HO), glucose production ([6,6-H]glucose) and whole-body lipolysis ([H]glycerol) were measured after an overnight fast on study day 2. Youth with type 2 diabetes (n = 9) were subsequently evaluated with an identical 2 day protocol after 3 months on the metformin study.
Results: Compared with individuals with NGT, those with type 2 diabetes had higher fasting (7.8 ± 2.5 vs 5.1 ± 0.3 mmol/l, mean ± SD p = 0.002) and 2 h glucose concentrations (13.8 ± 4.5 vs 5.9 ± 0.9 mmol/l, p = 0.001), higher rates of absolute gluconeogenesis (10.0 ± 1.7 vs 7.2 ± 1.1 μmol [kg fat-free mass (FFM)] min, p < 0.001) and whole-body lipolysis (5.2 ± 0.9 vs 4.0 ± 1.4 μmol kg min, p < 0.01), but lower fasting iGLP-1 concentrations (0.5 ± 0.5 vs 1.3 ± 0.7 pmol/l, p < 0.01). Metformin decreased 2 h glucose (pre metformin 11.4 ± 2.8 vs post metformin 9.9 ± 1.9 mmol/l, p = 0.04) and was associated with ~20-50% increase in IGI (median [25th-75th percentile] pre 1.39 [0.89-1.47] vs post 1.43 [0.88-2.70], p = 0.04), fasting iGLP-1 (pre 0.3 ± 0.2 vs post 1.0 ± 0.7 pmol/l, p = 0.02), 2 h iGLP (pre 0.4 ± 0.2 vs post 1.2 ± 0.9 pmol/l, p = 0.06), fasting PYY (pre 6.3 ± 2.2 vs post 10.5 ± 4.3 pmol/l, p < 0.01) and 2 h PYY (pre 6.6 ± 2.9 vs post 9.0 ± 4.0 pmol/l, p < 0.01). There was no change in BMI, insulin sensitivity or GIP concentrations pre vs post metformin. There were no differences pre vs post metformin in rates of glucose production (15.0 ± 3.9 vs 14.9 ± 2.2 μmol kg min, p = 0.84), absolute gluconeogenesis (9.9 ± 1.8 vs 9.7 ± 1.7 μmol kg min, p = 0.76) or whole-body lipolysis (5.0 ± 0.7 vs 5.3 ± 1.3 μmol kg min, p = 0.20). Post metformin iGLP-1 and PYY concentrations in youth with type 2 diabetes were comparable to levels in youth with NGT.
Conclusions/interpretation: Overall, the improved postprandial blood glucose levels and increase in incretins observed in the absence of changes in insulin sensitivity and gluconeogenesis, support an enteroinsular mechanistic pathway in youth with type 2 diabetes treated with short-term metformin.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-020-05236-y | DOI Listing |
JMIR Diabetes
January 2025
Center for Evaluation and Survey Research, HealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, MN, United States.
Background: Food choices play a significant role in achieving glycemic goals and optimizing overall health for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) can provide a comprehensive look at the impact of foods and other behaviors on glucose in real time and over the course of time. The impact of using a nutrition-focused approach (NFA) when initiating CGM in people with T2D is unknown.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMedicine (Baltimore)
January 2025
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Background: This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin versus gliclazide, combined with metformin, in treatment-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and glucotoxicity.
Methods: In this single-center, randomized, controlled noninferiority trial, 129 treatment-naive patients with T2DM with glucotoxicity (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] ≥ 200 mg/dL and glycated hemoglobin ≥ 9.0%) were randomized to receive sitagliptin plus metformin (n = 66) or gliclazide plus metformin (n = 63) for 12 weeks.
Medicine (Baltimore)
January 2025
The Department of Clinical Laboratory, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Rationale: Gitelman syndrome (GS) is a rare hereditary electrolyte disorder caused by mutations in the SLC12A3 gene. There is limited literature on the role of hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) testing and the SLC12A3 single heterozygous mutation in the diagnosis and management of patients with GS. In addition, cases of GS with concomitant kidney stones are rare.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Adv
January 2025
Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), a transient form of diabetes that resolves postpartum, is a major risk factor for type 2 diabetes (T2D) in women. While the progression from GDM to T2D is not fully understood, it involves both genetic and environmental components. By integrating clinical, metabolomic, and genome-wide association study (GWAS) data, we identified associations between decreased sphingolipid biosynthesis and future T2D, in part through the allele of the gene in Hispanic women shortly after a GDM pregnancy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFComput Inform Nurs
January 2025
Author Affiliations: Duke University School of Nursing (Drs Lee, Silva, Yang, Hatch, and Shaw and Mss Pennington, Matters, and Urlichich); and Duke University School of Medicine (Dr Crowley), Durham, NC.
Digital health literacy is emerging as an important element in chronic illness management, yet its relationship with clinical outcomes remains unclear. Utilizing data from the ongoing EXpanding Technology-Enabled, Nurse-Delivered Chronic Disease Care trial, this cross-sectional, correlational study explored the association between digital health literacy, health literacy, and patient outcomes, specifically blood pressure and hemoglobin A1c levels in 76 patients managing comorbid type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Results indicate patients had moderate digital health literacy, which was not significantly correlated with health literacy (r = 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!