The user and non-user perspective: Experiences of office workers with long-term access to sit-stand workstations.

PLoS One

Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Published: September 2020

Objective: Sit-stand workstations have been shown to be effective in reducing sitting time in office workers. The aim of this study was to explore reasons for use and non-use of sit-stand workstations and strategies to decrease sitting and increase physical activity in the workplace from perspectives of users and non-users, as well as from managers and ergo-coaches.

Methods: Six group interviews with employees who have had access to sit-stand workstations for several years were conducted in a large semi-governmental organisation in the Netherlands. Verbatim transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. Open coding was conducted by three researchers and codes and themes were discussed within the research team.

Results: Thematic analysis resulted in two major themes: 1) Reasons for use and non-use and 2) Strategies to increase standing and physical activity in the workplace. Shared and distinct reasons for use and non-use were identified between users and non-users of the sit-stand workstations. The most important reasons for use indicated by users were that they had experiencing immediate benefits, including staying alert and increasing focus; these benefits were not acknowledged by non-users. Non-users indicated that sitting was comfortable for them and that they were therefore not motivated to use the standing option. Strategies to increase the use of the standing option included an introductory phase to become familiar with working while standing and to experience the immediate benefits that come from using the standing option. Furthermore, providing reminders to use the standing option was suggested as a strategy to increase and sustain the use of sit-stand workstations. Increased use may lead to a change in the sitting culture within the organisation, as more employees would adopt active movement behaviours.

Conclusion: Immediate benefits of the use of the standing option-only mentioned by the users-was the most distinct reason to use sit-stand workstations. Future research should explore how to motivate potential users to adhere to an introductory phase in order to experience these immediate benefits, whether it is linked to the use of sit-stand workstations or other interventions to reduce sitting time.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7386596PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0236582PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sit-stand workstations
32
standing option
16
reasons non-use
12
office workers
8
sit-stand
8
access sit-stand
8
workstations
8
sitting time
8
physical activity
8
activity workplace
8

Similar Publications

The Impact of Sit-Stand Desks on Full-Day and Work-Based Sedentary Behavior of Office Workers: A Systematic Review.

Hum Factors

December 2024

CIDEFES - Universidade Lusófona, Lisboa & CIFI2D - Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Objective: To gather the existing evidence on the impact of sit-stand desk-based interventions on working-time and full-day sedentary behavior and compare their impact across different intervention lengths.

Background: Reducing sedentary behavior is vital for improving office workers' health. Sit-stand desks promote sitting and standing alternation, but understanding their effects outside the workplace is essential for success.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Stand-Capable Workstations Reduce Occupational Sedentary Time Among Administrative Workers.

IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors

October 2024

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONSIn this study, we found that workers who use stand-biased desks stood more and sat less during their workday compared to workers who use traditional desks. Stand-biased users also experienced significantly less lower back discomfort compared to both traditional and sit-stand workstation users. Based on these findings, we recommend that the use of stand-biased workstations be considered when designing or renovating work office workspaces.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The 'Sit-Stand -Guide' training program was created to improve the use of sit-stand workstations and was assessed for its usability and effectiveness among users in a municipal organization.
  • Participants completed surveys before the training, right after, and at 4 weeks and 12 months later, showing increased knowledge and confidence in using SSWs.
  • Results revealed a reduction in sitting time and lower back discomfort post-training, indicating the program's success, but further evaluation in varied work settings is recommended.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Prolonged periods of sitting have been linked to negative health outcomes. Implementation of sit-stand desks in the workplace has been one strategy to reduce prolonged sitting.

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of sit-stand workstations on reducing sitting time and improving other health outcomes of office-based workers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Co-design and development of the sit-stand e-guide: An e-training program for the optimal use of sit-stand workstations.

Appl Ergon

April 2024

The University of Queensland, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; University of Southern Queensland, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Ipswich, QLD, Australia.

This paper describes the co-design and development process of an evidence-informed e-training program (Sit-Stand e-Guide) to support the safe and optimal use of sit-stand workstations from ergonomics and behavioural change perspectives. Using an instructional system design process, supported by a participatory design approach, data was collected through three workshops with workplace consumers (staff [n = 5] and managers [n = 5]), and subject matter experts (n = 5). Content and learning activities were developed based on behaviour change principles and optimal pedagogy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!