Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Pore size is one of the most important properties in the successful operation of membrane-based bioprocesses for the treatment of municipal wastewater. The characteristics of two anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs), one with a hollow fiber membrane of 0.4 μm pore size (AnMBR1), and the other with a membrane of 0.05 μm pore size (AnMBR2) were investigated for the treatment of real municipal wastewater at room temperature (25 °C) under varied hydraulic retention times (HRTs). Process performance was evaluated in terms of organic removal efficiency, biogas production and membrane filtration behaviours during a long-term continuous operation. Both AnMBRs showed good organic removal performance with COD and BOD removal efficiencies of around 89% and 93%, respectively. High energy recovery potential was achieved, with the biogas yield ranging between 0.20 and 0.26 L-gas/g-COD and a methane content of approximately 75%. The differences in the membrane filtration behaviours in the two AnMBRs included different permeate flux and total filtration resistance (R). In the AnMBR with a 0.4 μm pore size membrane, an average R of 1.08 × 10^12 m was obtained even when the permeate flux was a high 0.274 m/day, while a higher average R of 1.51 × 10^12 m was observed in the AnMBR with 0.05 μm pore size membrane even when the flux was a low 0.148 m/day. The off-line membrane cleaning strategy used for AnMBR1 indicated that the membrane restoration efficiency was 90.2%.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140903 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!