Comparison of bone-to-implant contact and bone volume around implants placed with or without site preparation: a histomorphometric study in rabbits.

Sci Rep

Department of Oral Rehabilitation, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, 69978, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Published: July 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compared the effectiveness of a new dental implant that can be inserted without bone preparation to a conventional implant that requires drilling.
  • Thirty-one implants were tested in rabbits using two methods: no site preparation and limited cortical perforation, with results showing similar bone contact and occupancy values for all methods.
  • The findings suggest that newer implant designs might not need traditional preparation techniques, potentially simplifying the implantation process.

Article Abstract

The objective of this in vivo study was to compare bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) values of a new implant, designed to be inserted without bone preparation, using two different preparation protocols: no site preparation and prior limited cortical perforation, versus the values of a control implant using a conventional drilling protocol. Forty-one implants were inserted in 13 rabbits. Thirteen test implants with a new thread design were inserted using no bone preparation (NP), 14 test implants were inserted with limited cortical perforation (CP), and 14 conventional implants served as control. Five animals were sacrificed after 21 days and eight animals after 42 days. Histomorphometric analysis was performed and percentage of BIC and BAFO values were measured. ANOVA with Tukey post hoc and Mann-Whitney nonparametric tests were calculated to compare between the groups. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in the measured values between any of the groups, neither compered by implant nor by compered day. The results demonstrated that biological osseointegration parameters of implant that was inserted without any bone preparation was non-inferior compared to conventional preparation. The clinical relevance is that novel implant designs may not require bone preparation prior to placement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7381624PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69455-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bone preparation
16
inserted bone
12
bone-to-implant contact
8
preparation
8
site preparation
8
bafo values
8
preparation prior
8
limited cortical
8
cortical perforation
8
implants inserted
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!