AI Article Synopsis

  • Screening tests for detecting antibiotics in honey are quick and user-friendly but have a high rate of false positives, which complicates safety assessments.
  • A more reliable method using liquid chromatography High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (LC-HRMS) showed good sensitivity in detecting antibiotic residues, revealing that many honey samples previously tested had false positive results, emphasizing the need for accurate testing, especially for organic honey.

Article Abstract

Honey contaminations could derive from intensive agriculture and industrial activities, but also from beekeeper treatments. In EU no MRLs for antibiotics in honey are set, only a minimum required performance limit for chloramphenicol of 0.3 μg kg is recommended. Screening tests are available, characterised by their rapidity and simple use. Due to their high rate of false positives and the need to meet zero tolerance levels for antibiotics, their presence in samples was investigated using a liquid chromatography High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (LC-HRMS) multiclass antibiotic residue method, comparing the results with those of previous screening tests. The confirmatory method showed good sensitivity: CCα and CCβ ranging from 0.03 to 4.80 ng g and from 0.12 to 5.56 ng g, respectively. Ninety-eight honey samples from different geographical areas, analysed by two screening tests, showed a high percentage of false positives. This is fundamental to guarantee honey safety, especially, for organic production.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127575DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

screening tests
12
false positives
8
honey
5
determination antibiotic
4
antibiotic residues
4
residues honey
4
honey relation
4
relation potential
4
potential sources
4
sources relevance
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!