Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objectives: Although cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has become a well-established and effective treatment for symptomatic cervical degeneration, many patients with multilevel disease are not good candidates for CDA at all levels. For such patients, hybrid surgery (HS)-a combination of adjacent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and CDA-may be more appropriate. Given the novelty of HS and the relative dearth of studies adequately assessing short-term perioperative complications, this current study sought to assess the short-term morbidity profile of HS, differences in operative duration, length of stay (LOS), and readmission and reoperation rates and reasons relative to a 2-level ACDF cohort.

Methods: All patients who underwent HS and 2-level ACDF were identified between 2011 and 2018 using a large, prospectively collected registry. Baseline patient characteristics and postoperative complications were compared using bivariate and/or multivariate analysis.

Results: A total of 390 patients undergoing HS were identified. Two-level procedures were the most common (74.9%). Patients undergoing HS were more likely to be younger, male, and have fewer comorbidities. There were no differences between HS and 2-level ACDF in rates of any postoperative complication, transfusion, readmissions, and operative duration. However, HS had a decreased LOS (0.5 days), relative to a 2-level ACDF. HS patients had low rates of reoperation (1.28%) with 1 case for hematoma evacuation and another for revision CDA.

Conclusions: This study represents one of the largest cohorts of patients undergoing HS reported to date. Patients undergoing HS are not at increased risk of perioperative complications relative to a 2-level ACDF and may benefit from shorter LOS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8453682PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568220941453DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

2-level acdf
20
patients undergoing
16
relative 2-level
12
anterior cervical
8
cervical discectomy
8
discectomy fusion
8
cervical disc
8
disc arthroplasty
8
patients
8
perioperative complications
8

Similar Publications

Objective: To examine the mid-term efficacy and imaging results of using the Mobi-C and Bryan implants after cervical hybrid surgery for 2-level cervical spondylolisthesis, and to observe their postoperative changes and differences in the flexion-extension center of rotation (FE-COR) for the anterior cervical disc replacement (ACDR) segment.

Methods: Patients who underwent cervical hybrid surgery between June 2014 and June 2019 were included in this study. The mJOA, NDI, and VAS scores were used to assess clinical outcomes, and the FE-COR of the ACDR segment was measured.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: During the past decade, spinal surgical procedures have been increasingly performed on an ambulatory basis, a change in clinical practice supported only by observational evidence thus far. There have been no randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing ambulatory care with inpatient care after any spinal surgery.

Objective: To assess whether ambulatory care is noninferior to overnight hospital surveillance in functional outcome, as measured by Neck Disability Index (NDI), in adults after anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for cervical radiculopathy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The modified frailty index (mFI-5) has been shown to be a reliable risk stratification tool in different spine procedures. Its usefulness to predict complications after 1-level or 2-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) has not been studied extensively.

Purpose: We aimed to assess the usefulness of the mFI-5 in 1-level or 2-level ACDF surgery by asking the following questions: (1) Is the mFI-5 a reliable tool to predict complications after 1-level or 2-level ACDF? (2) Is the mFI-5 useful in predicting prolonged hospital stay after 1-level or 2-level ACDF? (3) Is the mFI-5 useful in predicting readmission after 1-level or 2-level ACDF?

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients who underwent 1-level or 2-level ACDF at our institution.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to examine the relationship between patients' preoperative expectations of pain relief and their functional outcomes and satisfaction after anterior cervical surgery, focusing on data collected from surgeries performed between 2016-2021.
  • Researchers analyzed data from 198 ACDF and 52 CDR patients, finding no significant links between expected pain relief and improvement in functional scores or satisfaction after 12 months; however, higher preoperative dissatisfaction was correlated with better postoperative improvement.
  • The results suggest that while patients’ preoperative expectations may not directly influence their outcomes, those who start off less satisfied may experience greater functional improvements following surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study is a retrospective analysis comparing various metrics (mean work RVUs, operative time, and efficiency measured as wRVUs/min) for single- and multilevel cervical spine fusions conducted from 2011 to 2020.
  • The researchers examined data for nearly 101,000 patients, focusing on anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF), finding that anterior fusions were typically quicker but varied in efficiency depending on the number of fusion levels.
  • Results highlighted significant differences between the surgical approaches, indicating that while anterior fusions had lower wRVUs in single and multi-level procedures, they were more efficient in the 1- and 2-level categories
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!