1. This study evaluated and characterised the effect of folic acid (FA) on chromosomal DNA methylation and the epigenetic result on gene expression control mechanisms in chicken B cells as a model of antigen presenting cells. 2. After FA supplementation, the methylation pattern on the proximal promoter area and mRNA expression of toll-like receptor (TLR) 2b, TLR4, B cell receptor (BCR) immunoglobulin (Ig) β and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II β chain genes in chicken B cells was observed 3. Chicken B cell line (DT40) cultures were incubated with 0, 1.72 or 3.96 mM of FA for 4 and 8 h and samples were taken at specific time points. After 4 h of incubation, cells were challenged with 0, 1 or 10 µg/ml of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and samples were collected 4 h post-challenge. 4. FA supplementation modified the methylation patterns of the proximal promoter regions of TLR4, Igß, and MHCII ß chain at 4 and 8 hours of incubation; however, the single CpG dinucleotide of TLR2b remained methylated regardless of the treatment. 5. A positive association was found between FA concentration and percentage DNA methylation on the promoter area of Igβ and TLR2b. However, there was a negative association between FA and MHCII β chain. 6. There were downregulatory effects in TLR4, Igß and MHCII ß chain gene expression after 8 h of incubation, nut not at 4 h. Although incubation time did not affect TLR2b gene expression, FA concentration did, whereby it increased TLR2b expression at 1.72 mM FA (P < 0.05). 7. LPS significant downregulated TLR2b expression, while an interaction between FA and LPS concentration affected TLR4 and Igβ gene expression. 8. In conclusion, the results showed that FA can have an immunomodulatory effect on chicken B cells, possibly affecting their ability to both recognise antigens through the TLR and BCR pathways, and to present it the MHCII presentation pathway.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2020.1799332DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

proximal promoter
12
promoter area
12
gene expression
12
mhcii chain
12
folic acid
8
area mrna
8
mrna expression
8
chicken cell
8
antigen presenting
8
presenting cells
8

Similar Publications

Mutations in tumor suppressor genes Vhl and Rassf1a cause DNA damage, chromosomal instability and induce gene expression changes characteristic of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Kidney Int

December 2024

Clinic of Internal Medicine I, Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Medical Centre - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Freiburg (CCCF), Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Freiburg; Signalling Research Centres BIOSS and CIBSS, Faculty of Biology University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. Electronic address:

RASSF1A is frequently biallelically inactivated in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) due to loss of chromosome 3p and promoter hypermethylation. Here we investigated the cellular and molecular consequences of single and combined deletion of the Rassf1a and Vhl tumor suppressor genes to model the common ccRCC genotype of combined loss of function of RASSF1A and VHL. In mouse embryonic fibroblasts and in primary kidney epithelial cells, double deletion of Rassf1a and Vhl caused chromosomal segregation defects and increased formation of micronuclei, demonstrating that pVHL and RASSF1A function to maintain genomic integrity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The development and diversification of sensory proprioceptive neurons, which reside in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and express the tropomyosin receptor kinase C (TrkC), depend on the transcription factor (TF) Runx3. Runx3-deficient mice develop severe limb ataxia due to TrkC neuron cell death. Two additional TFs Pou4f1 (also called Brn3a) and Isl1 also play an important role in sensory neuron development.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Putative looping factor ZNF143/ZFP143 is an essential transcriptional regulator with no looping function.

Mol Cell

December 2024

Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Genomic Mechanisms of Disease, Gene Regulation Observatory, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Electronic address:

Interactions between distal loci, including those involving enhancers and promoters, are a central mechanism of gene regulation in mammals, yet the protein regulators of these interactions remain largely undetermined. The zinc-finger transcription factor (TF) ZNF143/ZFP143 has been strongly implicated as a regulator of chromatin interactions, functioning either with or without CTCF. However, how ZNF143/ZFP143 functions as a looping factor is not well understood.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) is a growth factor and pluripotent cytokine that promotes angiogenesis in cancer cells, transitioning to an angiogenic phenotype. The binding of VEGF-A protein to VEGF receptors (VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2) initiates a cascade of events that stimulates angiogenesis by facilitating the migration and enhancing the permeability of endothelial cells. The proximal promoter of the VEGF gene encompasses a 36-base pair region (from -85 to -50) that can form a stable G-quadruplex (G4) structure in specific conditions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

TSS-Captur: a user-friendly pipeline for characterizing unclassified RNA transcripts.

NAR Genom Bioinform

December 2024

Institute for Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics, Department of Computer Science,  University of Tübingen, Sand 14, Tübingen 72076, Germany.

RNA-seq and its 5'-enrichment methods for prokaryotes have enabled the precise identification of transcription start sites (TSSs), improving gene expression analysis. Computational methods are applied to these data to identify TSSs and classify them based on proximal annotated genes. While some TSSs cannot be classified at all (orphan TSSs), other TSSs are found on the reverse strand of known genes (antisense TSSs) but are not associated with the direct transcription of any known gene.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!