Study Design: Prospective study.

Purpose: Yellow flags are psychosocial associated with a greater likelihood of progression to persistent pain and disability. These are referred to as obstacles to recovery. Despite their recognized importance, it is unknown how effective clinicians are in detecting them. The primary objective of this study was thus to determine the effectiveness of spine specialist clinicians in detecting the presence of yellow flags in patients presenting to an orthopedic outpatient clinic with low back-related disorders.

Overview Of Literature: Psychosocial factors have been previously studied as important predictors of prognosis in patients with low back pain. However, the ability of spinal specialist to identify them remains unknown.

Methods: A prospective, single-center, consecutive cohort study was conducted over a period of 30 months. All new patients with low back-related disorders regardless of pathology completed a Yellow Flag Questionnaire that was adapted from the psychosocial flags framework. Clinicians assessing these patients completed a standardized form to determine which and how many yellow flags they had identified during the consultation.

Results: A total of 130 patients were included in the analysis, and the clinicians reported an average of 5 flags (range, 0-9). Fear of movement or injury was the most frequently reported yellow flag, reported by 87.7% (n=114) of patients. Clinician sensitivity in detecting yellow flags was poor, correctly identifying only 2 flags, on average, of the 5 reported by patients, with an overall sensitivity of only 39%.

Conclusions: The ability of spine specialists to identify yellow flags is poor and can be improved by asking patients to complete a simple screening questionnaire.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055455PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2019.0377DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

yellow flags
20
patients low
12
patients
9
ability spine
8
spine specialists
8
specialists identify
8
obstacles recovery
8
flags
8
clinicians detecting
8
low back-related
8

Similar Publications

Background: Patient and clinician expectations of benefit from recommended management approaches may potentially impact the success of managing musculoskeletal conditions.

Methods: This was a multisite study in an advanced practice musculoskeletal service across Queensland, Australia. Relationships between patient and clinician (advanced physiotherapy practitioner) expectations of benefit, patient characteristics, and clinical outcome recorded 6 months later were explored with regression analysis in 619 patients undergoing non-surgical multidisciplinary care for either knee osteoarthritis (n = 286), low back pain (n = 249) or shoulder impingement syndrome (n = 84).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Same patient but different worlds: A state-of-the-art review translating best practice psychosocial care from musculoskeletal care to the orthopaedic context.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

December 2024

Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.

Background: Individuals with chronic musculoskeletal conditions experience persistent pain and disability that has deleterious impacts on physical function, psychological health, social engagement, relationships, and work participation. This impact is greater in people with psychosocial risk factors, and best practice musculoskeletal care recommends a biopsychosocial approach to management. Orthopaedic surgery is often an effective management approach for chronic musculoskeletal conditions, but research has only recently explored the links between differing patient outcomes after orthopaedic surgery and psychosocial risk factors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Upper cervical instability (UCI) is a potentially disabling complication of the connective tissue disorders hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome and Hypermobility Spectrum Disorders (hEDS/HSD). UCI can impact various neurological structures, including the brainstem, spinal cord, cranial nerves, and blood supply to and from the brain, resulting in complex neurological signs and symptoms in this population. The current study was an observational study applying recent expert consensus recommendations for physical therapy assessment and management of patients with UCI associated with hEDS/HSD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Early detection of prognostic factors using the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) or the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (ÖMPQ-21) can predict improvement in pain and disability for patients with nonspecific LBP.

Objectives: To translate and cross-culturally adapt the OSPRO-YF and the ÖMPQ-21 with their short versions into the Italian language and to test their measurement properties in patients with LBP.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Clinical Examination, Diagnosis, and Conservative Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review.

Life (Basel)

August 2024

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, VITAZ, Moerlandstraat 1, 9100 Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.

Chronic low back pain is one of the most frequent reasons for medical consultation. It is important to make the correct diagnosis to select the most appropriate treatment in a stepwise approach. In this narrative review, we focus on the clinical examination, the diagnosis, and the conservative treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!