Prognostic Importance of Metastatic Site in Intermediate-risk Group Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

Objective: To determine the prognostic importance of the metastatic site in metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) patients in the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) intermediate-risk.

Study Design: Observational study.

Place And Duration Of Study: Department of Medical Oncology, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, from January 2010 to November 2018.

Methodology: Records of 113 mRCC patients, determined to be in the intermediate-risk group according to IMDC criteria, were reviewed retrospectively. All patients used a tyrosine kinase inhibitor - sunitinib or pazopanib - for metastatic disease. Patients' records included age, gender, metastatic site, number of metastases and treatment regimen. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and a Cox regression model was formed.

Results: The median age of the patients was 58 years (Q1 - Q3: 44 - 66 years) and 87.6% of the patients had ≥2 metastatic sites. The most common metastatic sites were the lung (51.3%), lymph nodes (26.5%), bone (26.5%) and brain (17.7%). Median overall survival (OS) was shorter in the patients with bone and brain metastasis than in those without (15.0 months vs. 21.0 months, p = .026 and 14.0 months vs. 21.0 months, p = .009, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that brain and bone metastasis were independent prognostic risk factors (HR: 2.43, p = .017 and HR: 2.10, p = .042, respectively).

Conclusion: Bone and brain metastasis had a negative effect on OS in IMDC intermediate-risk group mRCC patients. Key Words: Metastatic site, Brain metastasis, Bone metastasis, Renal cell carcinoma, Prognosis.