AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study explored the impact of two different ligation levels (high ligation (HL) and low ligation (LL)) of the inferior mesenteric artery during laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery on postoperative outcomes, specifically focusing on complications and operation time.
  • - Results showed that patients in the LL group experienced significantly lower rates of anastomotic leakage (2.8%) compared to those in the HL group (11.0%), as well as a reduced need for diverting stomas (7.5% vs. 16.5%).
  • - The research identified HL ligation, tumor position below the peritoneal reflection, and age (65 years or older) as significant risk factors for anastom

Article Abstract

Background: For laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery, the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) can be ligated at its origin from the aorta [high ligation (HL)] or distally to the origin of the left colic artery [low ligation (LL)]. Whether different ligation levels are related to different postoperative complications, operation time, and lymph node yield remains controversial. Therefore, we designed this study to determine the effects of different ligation levels in rectal cancer surgery.

Aim: To investigate the operative results following HL and LL of the IMA in rectal cancer patients.

Methods: From January 2017 to July 2019, this retrospective cohort study collected information from 462 consecutive rectal cancer patients. According to the ligation level, 235 patients were assigned to the HL group while 227 patients were assigned to the LL group. Data regarding the clinical characteristics, surgical characteristics and complications, pathological outcomes and postoperative recovery were obtained and compared between the two groups. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the possible risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL).

Results: Compared to the HL group, the LL group had a significantly lower AL rate, with 6 (2.8%) cases in the LL group and 24 (11.0%) cases in the HL group ( = 0.001). The HL group also had a higher diverting stoma rate (16.5% 7.5%, = 0.003). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was subsequently performed to adjust for the confounding factors and confirmed that HL (OR = 3.599; 95%CI: 1.374-9.425; = 0.009), tumor located below the peritoneal reflection (OR = 2.751; 95%CI: 0.772-3.985; = 0.031) and age (≥ 65 years) (OR = 2.494; 95%CI: 1.080-5.760; = 0.032) were risk factors for AL. There were no differences in terms of patient demographics, pathological outcomes, lymph nodes harvested, blood loss, hospital stay and urinary function ( > 0.05).

Conclusion: In rectal cancer surgery, LL should be the preferred method, as it has a lower AL and diverting stoma rate.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7340993PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v12.i6.632DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rectal cancer
24
cancer surgery
12
anastomotic leakage
8
ligation levels
8
patients assigned
8
assigned group
8
pathological outcomes
8
multivariate logistic
8
logistic regression
8
regression analysis
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!