A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Efficacy and safety of nivolumab for advanced gastric cancer patients with poor performance statuses. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Nivolumab has shown better outcomes in treating advanced gastric cancer (AGC) compared to best supportive care, especially in patients who have undergone at least two prior treatments.
  • A study assessed the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in AGC patients, revealing that those with poor performance status (PS) had significantly shorter overall survival and lower disease control rates compared to those with better PS.
  • The findings suggest that while nivolumab is a possible treatment option for AGC patients with poor PS, it may not be effective enough as a third or later-line therapy due to insufficient survival benefits.

Article Abstract

Background: Nivolumab has changed the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Nivolumab shows better outcomes compared to best supportive care among AGC patients who received at least two prior regimens. However, there are no reliable data regarding AGC patients with poor performance status (PS) who received nivolumab. We investigated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab among AGC patients with poor PS.

Methods: We retrospectively collected clinicopathologic data from patients with AGC who underwent nivolumab monotherapy at our institution from October 2017 to June 2019.

Results: Forty-nine AGC patients who received nivolumab were assessed. Twenty-seven patients had PS 0 or 1 (Good group) and 22 had PS 2 or 3 (Poor group). The median progression-free survival and overall survival durations were 2.0 and 6.0 months in the Good group, respectively, and 1.2 and 2.8 months in the Poor group, respectively. The overall survival was significantly shorter in the Poor group (6.0 vs 2.8 months, p = 0.0255). The disease control rates were 23 and 9% in the Good and Poor groups, respectively. Thirty-three percent of patients experienced immune-related adverse events in the Good group, and 18% in the Poor group.

Conclusion: Nivolumab is feasible but insufficient as third- or later-line treatment for AGC patients with poor PS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7376661PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07176-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

agc patients
20
patients poor
16
good group
12
poor group
12
patients
9
poor
9
efficacy safety
8
nivolumab
8
safety nivolumab
8
advanced gastric
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!