Objective: Compare comorbidity identification in Medicare and Veterans Health Administration (VA) data for the purposes of risk adjustment.

Data Sources: Analysis of Medicare and VA datasets for dually-enrolled Veterans receiving care in both settings, fiscal years 2010-2014.

Study Design: A retrospective analysis of administrative data for a national sample of cancer decedents.

Data Extraction Methods: Comorbidities were evaluated using Elixhauser and Charlson coding algorithms.

Principal Findings: Clinical comorbidities were more likely to be recorded in Medicare than in VA datasets. Of 42 comorbidities, 36 (86%) were recorded at a different frequency. For example, congestive heart failure was recorded for 22.0% of patients in Medicare data and for 11.3% of patients in VA data (P<0.001).

Conclusion: There are large differences in comorbidity assessment across VA and Medicare administrative data for the same patient, posing challenges for risk adjustment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001329DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

veterans health
8
health administration
8
medicare datasets
8
medicare
5
comorbidity assessment
4
assessment uneven
4
uneven veterans
4
administration medicare
4
medicare patient
4
patient implications
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!