AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare continuous mode (CM) and pulsed mode (PM) microwave ablation algorithms on lung tumor mimic models in pigs, assessing their effectiveness in tumor destruction.
  • A total of 43 tumor-mimic models of varying sizes (1, 2, and 3 cm) were created in 11 pigs, and the ablation zones were measured via 3D imaging and post-procedural pathological analysis.
  • Results indicated that both CM and PM effectively ablated tumors, but with moderate reproducibility, and the only significant difference was seen in the size of 1 cm tumors treated by PM, which were smaller.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate microwave ablation (MWA) algorithms, comparing pulsed and continuous mode in an lung tumor mimic model.

Materials And Methods: A total of 43 lung tumor-mimic models of 1, 2 or 3 cm were created in 11 pigs through an intra-pulmonary injection of contrast-enriched minced muscle. Tumors were ablated under fluoroscopic and 3D-CBCT-guidance using a single microwave antenna. Continuous (CM) and pulsed mode (PM) were used. According to tumor size, 3 different algorithms for both continuous and pulsed mode were used. The ablation zones were measured using post-procedural 3D-CBCT and on pathologic specimens.

Results: Two radiologists measured the ablation zones on CBCT and they significantly correlated with macroscopic and microscopic pathological findings:  = 0.75 and 0.74 respectively ( < 0.0001) (inter-observer correlation  = 0.9). For 1, 2 and 3 cm tumors mimics lesions (TMLs), mean maximal and transverse ablation diameters were 3.6 [Formula: see text] 0.3 × 2.2 [Formula: see text] 0.3 cm; 4.1 [Formula: see text] 0.5 × 2.6 [Formula: see text] 0.3 cm and 4.8 [Formula: see text] 0.3 × 3.2 [Formula: see text] 0.3 cm respectively using CM; And, 3.0 [Formula: see text] 0.2 × 2.1 [Formula: see text] 0.2 cm; 4.0 [Formula: see text] 0.4 × 2.7 [Formula: see text] 0.4 cm and 4.6 [Formula: see text] 0.4 × 3.2 [Formula: see text] 0.4 cm respectively for PM, without any significant difference except for 1 cm TMLs treated by PM ablation which were significantly smaller ( = 0.009) The sphericity index was 1.6, 1.6, 1.5 and 1.4, 1.5, 1.4 at 1, 2 and 3 cm for CM and PM respectively,  = 0.07, 0.14 and 0.13 for 1, 2 and 3 cm tumors mimics.

Conclusion: Microwave ablation for 1-3 cm lung tumors were successfully realized but with a moderate reproducibility rate, using either CM or PM. Immediate post ablation CBCT can accurately evaluate ablation zones.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2020.1787530DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ablation zones
12
microwave ablation
8
continuous pulsed
8
pulsed mode
8
ablation
5
lung microwave
4
ablation swine
4
swine tumor
4
tumor model
4
model experiment
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!