Reinhold Kreutz and colleagues in a recent editorial claim the Hygia Chronotherapy Trial lacks credibility because of deficient methods, thereby dismissing both the plausibility and clinical significance of its reported findings. They misstate and misrepresent crucial information, findings and conclusions unambiguously detailed in the published report of the Hygia Chronotherapy Trial. The purpose of this communication is to provide a complete rebuttal to each and every one of the misleading and scientifically unsupported claims by Kreutz et al. that calls into question their expertise to decry the merits, advantages, limitations and validity of correctly designed and conducted ambulatory blood pressure monitoring-based chronotherapy trials.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2020.1781351DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hygia chronotherapy
12
chronotherapy trial
12
chronotherapy
5
bedtime hypertension
4
hypertension chronotherapy
4
chronotherapy best
4
best reduces
4
reduces cardiovascular
4
cardiovascular disease
4
disease risk
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!