Harder, better, faster, stronger: Weapon size is more sexually dimorphic than weapon biomechanical components in two freshwater anomuran species.

J Morphol

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, São Paulo, Brazil.

Published: September 2020

Sexual selection influences the evolution of morphological traits that increase the likelihood of monopolizing scarce resources. When such traits are used during contests, they are termed weapons. Given that resources are typically linked to monopolizing mating partners, theory expects only males to bear weapons. In some species, however, females also bear weapons, although typically smaller than male weapons. Understanding why females bear smaller weapons can thus help us understand the selective pressures behind weapon evolution. However, most of our knowledge comes from studies on weapon size, while the biomechanics of weapons, such as the size of the muscles, efficiency, and shape are seldom studied. Our goal was to test if the theoretical expectations for weapon size sexual dimorphism also occur for weapon biomechanics using two aeglid crab species. Males of both species had larger claws which were also stronger than female claws. Male claws were also more efficient than females' claws (although we used only one species in this analysis). For weapon shape, though, only one species differed in the mean claw shape. Regarding scaling differences, in both species, male claws had higher size scaling than females, while only one species had a higher shape scaling. However, male weapons did not have higher scaling regarding strength and efficiency than females. Thus, males apparently allocate more resources in weapons than females, but once allocated, muscle and efficiency follow a similar developmental pathway in both sexes. Taken together, our results show that sexual dimorphism in weapons involves more than differences in size. Shape differences are especially intriguing because we cannot fully understand its causes. Yet, we highlight that such subtle differences can only be detected by measuring and analysing weapon shape and biomechanical components. Only then we might better understand how weapons are forged.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmor.21234DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

weapon size
12
weapons
10
weapon
8
biomechanical components
8
species
8
bear weapons
8
females bear
8
male weapons
8
sexual dimorphism
8
male claws
8

Similar Publications

Background: Firearm violence in America has been declared a public health crisis. This study investigates variation in firearm injuries by county-level characteristics and intent of firearm use.

Study Design: The open-access FLHealthCHARTS was searched for firearm injuries from 1989-2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Sulfur mustard (SM) is a chemical warfare agent that increases oxidative stress in veterans. The literature assessing oxidant/antioxidant parameters in SM-exposed veterans contains conflicting results. A total of 11 relevant studies were identified and screened.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The healthcare sector faces a growing threat from the rise of highly resistant microorganisms, particularly Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR P. aeruginosa). Facing the challenge of antibiotic resistance, nanoparticles have surfaced as promising substitutes for antimicrobial therapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Glioma-Derived Exosomes and Their Application as Drug Nanoparticles.

Int J Mol Sci

November 2024

Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Piazzale S. Maria della Misericordia 15, 33100 Udine, Italy.

Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive primary tumor of the Central Nervous System (CNS) with a low survival rate. The malignancy of GBM is sustained by a bidirectional crosstalk between tumor cells and the Tumor Microenvironment (TME). This mechanism of intercellular communication is mediated, at least in part, by the release of exosomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Personalised antimicrobial susceptibility testing with clinical prediction modelling informs appropriate antibiotic use.

Nat Commun

November 2024

Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, William Henry Duncan Building, 6 West Derby Street, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing is a key weapon against antimicrobial resistance. Diagnostic microbiology laboratories use one-size-fits-all testing approaches that are often imprecise, inefficient, and inequitable. Here, we report a personalised approach that adapts laboratory testing for urinary tract infection to maximise the number of appropriate treatment options for each patient.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!