AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study investigated the critical role of supervisors in helping injured workers return to work after musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and aimed to create actionable strategies to enhance supervisor involvement in this process.
  • - Two phases of qualitative research were conducted: analyzing interviews from a previous study to generate actionable proposals, and testing their relevance and practicality through questionnaires and focus groups.
  • - Eight courses of action were identified, along with specific actions for supervisors, all of which were generally seen as relevant and feasible by participants, highlighting that the organizational context significantly affects how these strategies are applied.

Article Abstract

Purpose Supervisors play an important role during the return to work (RTW) of injured workers. Yet little research has been done on the actions associated with this role or the contexts in which they are taken. The purpose of this study was to develop courses of action to promote supervisors' involvement in the process aimed at achieving sustainable RTW for workers following a work-related musculoskeletal disorder (MSD), and to verify their pertinence, feasibility, and applicability in practice. Methods A two-phase qualitative method was used. (1) Secondary content analysis of 46 interviews of 14 workers post-MSD and 32 other actors in the RTW process, conducted during a prior case study, yielded proposals for courses of action composed of specific actions for supervisors. (2) The pertinence, feasibility, and applicability of these courses of action and specific actions were explored, first, through a self-administered questionnaire to initiate individual reflection, and later in greater depth through focus groups to identify the different contexts in which they might be applicable. Thematic analysis was performed for each phase. Results Eight proposed courses of action, including specific concrete actions and conditions influencing supervisors' involvement, were developed by the researchers and generally perceived as pertinent and feasible by the participants. Several aspects of the organizational context appeared to influence implementation of these courses of action within the organizations. Conclusion Organizational context appears to influence the application of these courses of action, as do the conditions under which they are implemented.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09896-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

courses action
24
return work
8
workers work-related
8
work-related musculoskeletal
8
musculoskeletal disorder
8
supervisors' involvement
8
pertinence feasibility
8
feasibility applicability
8
specific actions
8
organizational context
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!