A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Subsphincteric Anastomosis During Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Its Positive Impact on Continence Recovery. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluated a new technique called subsphincteric anastomosis (SSA) for improving continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) in 187 patients.
  • Group 2, which received the SSA, showed significantly higher rates of continence recovery compared to Group 1, with 75.6% fully continent at catheter removal and up to 97.5% after one year.
  • Additionally, the SSA technique was associated with less need for urinary reeducation and better overall urinary quality of life, with no reported complications from the anastomosis.

Article Abstract

To assess the interest of a new sphincter preserving anastomosis technique for continence recovery after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). : We performed a monocentric single-operator study on 187 consecutive RALP. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (standard anastomosis, until December 2017) and Group 2 (subsphincteric anastomosis [SSA], since January 2018). The SSA consisted in respecting the sphincteric sleeve during the anastomosis suturing only the internal layer of the urethra with the bladder and thereby avoiding the loss of sphincteric length induced by the suture. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative data were prospectively collected and compared. Criteria of continence were as follows: no pad use and complete absence of leakage at catheter removal at 1 month and 1 year. The two groups were comparable in terms of prostate-specific antigen, gland volume, and Gleason score. In Group 2 (SSA), we observed a complete continence recovery in 75.6% at catheter removal ( = 0.0000035), in 82.9% at 1 month ( = 0.000092), and in 97.5% at 1 year ( = 0.028), independently of bladder neck preservation ( = 0.388). There was also a significant difference between the two groups concerning urinary reeducation requirement ( = 0.0006), pad use, and urinary quality of life ( = 0.0000002). No anastomosis complication was reported. The SSA significantly improved the rates of immediate, early, and 1-year continence recovery after RALP. These results need further study among larger numbers of patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757522PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0379DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

continence recovery
16
subsphincteric anastomosis
8
radical prostatectomy
8
catheter removal
8
continence
5
anastomosis
5
anastomosis laparoscopic
4
laparoscopic robot-assisted
4
robot-assisted radical
4
prostatectomy positive
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!