A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 144

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 144
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 212
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1002
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3142
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Implementation of the First US Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax in Berkeley, CA, 2015-2019. | LitMetric

Implementation of the First US Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax in Berkeley, CA, 2015-2019.

Am J Public Health

Jennifer Falbe is with the Department of Human Ecology, University of California, Davis. Anna H. Grummon is with the Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Cambridge, MA. At the time of the study, Nadia Rojas was with the School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley. Suzanne Ryan-Ibarra and Lynn D. Silver are with the Public Health Institute, Sacramento and Oakland, CA. Kristine A. Madsen is with the Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, and the Berkeley Food Institute, University of California, Berkeley.

Published: September 2020

To identify lessons learned from implementation of the nation's first sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) excise tax in 2015 in Berkeley, California. We interviewed city stakeholders and SSB distributors and retailers (n = 48) from June 2015 to April 2017 and analyzed records through January 2019. Lessons included the importance of thorough and timely communications with distributors and retailers, adequate lead time for implementation, advisory commissions for revenue allocations, and funding of staff, communications, and evaluation before tax collection begins. Early and robust outreach about the tax and programs funded can promote and sustain public support, reduce friction, and facilitate beverage price increases on SSBs only. No retailer reported raising food prices, indicating that Berkeley's SSB tax did not function as a "grocery tax," as industry claimed. Revenue allocations totaled more than $9 million for public health, nutrition, and health equity through 2021. The policy package, context, and implementation process facilitated translating policy into public health outcomes. Further research is needed to understand long-term facilitators and barriers to sustaining public health benefits of Berkeley's tax and how those differ from facilitators and barriers in jurisdictions facing significant industry-funded repeal efforts.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7427219PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305795DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

public health
12
sugar-sweetened beverage
8
distributors retailers
8
revenue allocations
8
facilitators barriers
8
tax
6
implementation
4
implementation sugar-sweetened
4
beverage tax
4
tax berkeley
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!