Objective: To assess feasibility of modified protocol during percutaneous tracheostomy in coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic era.
Design: A retrospective review of cohort who underwent percutaneous tracheostomy with modified protocol.
Settings: Medical, surgical, and neurologic ICUs.
Subjects: Patients admitted in medical, surgical, and neurologic units with prolonged need of mechanical ventilation or inability to liberate from the ventilator.
Interventions: A detailed protocol was written. Steps were defined to be performed before apnea and during apnea. A feasibility study of 28 patients was conducted. The key aerosol-generating portions of the procedure were performed with the ventilator switched to standby mode with the patient apneic.
Measurements And Main Results: Data including patient demographics, primary diagnosis, age, body mass index, and duration of apnea time during the tracheostomy were collected. Average ventilator standby time (apnea) during the procedure was 238 seconds (3.96 min) with range 149 seconds (2.48 min) to 340 seconds (5.66 min). Single-use (disposable) bronchoscopes (Ambu A/S [Ballerup, Denmark] or Glidescope [Verathon, Inc., Bothell, WA]) were used during all procedures except in nine. No desaturation events occurred during any procedure.
Conclusions: Percutaneous tracheostomy performed with apnea protocol may help minimize aerosolization, reducing risk of exposure of coronavirus disease 2019 to staff. It can be safely performed with portable bronchoscopes to limit staff and minimize the surfaces requiring disinfection post procedure.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7259562 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000134 | DOI Listing |
ANZ J Surg
December 2024
Department of Trauma Surgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Centre, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Background: Tracheostomy is performed in patients with trauma who need prolonged ventilation for respiratory failure or airway management. Although it has benefits, such as reduced sedation and easier care, it also has risks. This study explored the unclear timing, technique, and patient selection criteria for tracheostomy in patients with trauma.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Transl Res
November 2024
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Hangzhou 311100, Zhejiang, China.
Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of early tracheotomy in neurologic critical care patients.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 100 patients with severe craniocerebral injury (SCI) who underwent percutaneous tracheotomy at The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from January 2021 to February 2022. Of them, 52 cases (observation group) received the procedure within 24 hours of injury, while 48 patients (control group) received the procedure after 24 hours.
Clin Genitourin Cancer
November 2024
Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Purpose: Temporal trends in and predictors of inpatient palliative care use in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) undergoing critical care therapy are unknown.
Methods: Relying on the National Inpatient Sample (2008-2019), we identified mRCC patients undergoing critical care therapy, namely invasive mechanical ventilation, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion, dialysis for acute kidney failure, total parenteral nutrition, or tracheostomy. Estimated annual percentage changes (EAPC) analyses and multivariable logistic regression models addressed inpatient palliative care use.
Curr Opin Crit Care
February 2025
Adult Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!