AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examined how the acute to chronic workload ratio (ACWR) influenced injury rates in young male soccer players aged around 17 during a competitive training cycle.
  • A total of 22 players participated, measuring their session ratings of perceived exertion (sRPE), training time, and injury rates over 28 days, revealing more non-contact injuries compared to contact injuries.
  • Results indicated a stronger correlation between the ACWR model and non-contact injury occurrence, suggesting it is more effective for predicting injuries in this demographic than the alternative ACWR method used.

Article Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the acute to chronic workload ratio (ACWR), based upon participant session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE), using two models [(1) rolling averages (ACWR); and (2) exponentially weighted moving averages (ACWR)] and the injury rate in young male team soccer players aged 17.1 ± 0.7 years during a competitive mesocycle. Twenty-two players were enrolled in this study and performed four training sessions per week with 2 days of recovery and 1 match day per week. During each training session and each weekly match, training time and sRPE were recorded. In addition, training impulse (TRIMP), monotony, and strain were subsequently calculated. The rate of injury was recorded for each soccer player over a period of 4 weeks (i.e., 28 days) using a daily questionnaire. The results showed that over the course of the study, the number of non-contact injuries was significantly higher than that for contact injuries (2.5 vs. 0.5, = 0.01). There were also significant positive correlations between sRPE and training time ( = 0.411, = 0.039), ACWR ( = 0.47, = 0.049), and ACWR ( = 0.51, = 0.038). In addition, small-to-medium correlations were detected between ACWR and non-contact injury occurrence (ACWR, = 0.31, = 0.05; ACWR, = 0.53, = 0.03). Explained variance ( ) for non-contact injury was significantly greater using the ACWR model (ranging between 21 and 52%) compared with ACWR (ranging between 17 and 39%). In conclusion, the results of this study showed that the ACWR model is more sensitive than ACWR to identify non-contact injury occurrence in male team soccer players during a short period in the competitive season.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7327085PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00608DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

injury occurrence
12
male team
12
team soccer
12
soccer players
12
non-contact injury
12
acwr
11
acute chronic
8
chronic workload
8
workload ratio
8
young male
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!