Perioperative Use of Gabapentinoids for the Management of Postoperative Acute Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Anesthesiology

From the Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Trauma-Emergency-Critical Care Medicine, CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, Québec, Canada (M.V., F.L., C.P., X.S., A.-M.P., G.L., M.-J.C., X.N., A.F.T.) the Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (M.V., F.L., A.-M.P., G.L., A.F.T.) the Department of Medicine (F.L.) Faculty of Medicine, and the Interdisciplinary Research Centre for Rehabilitation and Social Integration (A.-M.P.), Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada the Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Critical Care, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (R.Z.) the Department of Haematology and Medical Oncology, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (R.Z.).

Published: August 2020

Background: Widely used for acute pain management, the clinical benefit from perioperative use of gabapentinoids is uncertain. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the analgesic effect and adverse events with the perioperative use of gabapentinoids in adult patients.

Methods: Randomized controlled trials studying the use of gabapentinoids in adult patients undergoing surgery were included. The primary outcome was the intensity of postoperative acute pain. Secondary outcomes included the intensity of postoperative subacute pain, incidence of postoperative chronic pain, cumulative opioid use, persistent opioid use, lengths of stay, and adverse events. The clinical significance of the summary estimates was assessed based on established thresholds for minimally important differences.

Results: In total, 281 trials (N = 24,682 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with controls, gabapentinoids were associated with a lower postoperative pain intensity (100-point scale) at 6 h (mean difference, -10; 95% CI, -12 to -9), 12 h (mean difference, -9; 95% CI, -10 to -7), 24 h (mean difference, -7; 95% CI, -8 to -6), and 48 h (mean difference, -3; 95% CI, -5 to -1). This effect was not clinically significant ranging below the minimally important difference (10 points out of 100) for each time point. These results were consistent regardless of the type of drug (gabapentin or pregabalin). No effect was observed on pain intensity at 72 h, subacute and chronic pain. The use of gabapentinoids was associated with a lower risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting but with more dizziness and visual disturbance.

Conclusions: No clinically significant analgesic effect for the perioperative use of gabapentinoids was observed. There was also no effect on the prevention of postoperative chronic pain and a greater risk of adverse events. These results do not support the routine use of pregabalin or gabapentin for the management of postoperative pain in adult patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000003428DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

perioperative gabapentinoids
16
acute pain
12
adverse events
12
chronic pain
12
difference 95%
12
pain
10
postoperative
8
management postoperative
8
postoperative acute
8
systematic review
8

Similar Publications

Objective: Optimal perioperative pain management is an essential component of perioperative care for the cardiac surgical patient. This turnkey order set is part of a series created by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Cardiac Society, first presented at the Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery in 2023. Several guidelines and expert consensus documents have been published to provide guidance on pain management and opioid reduction in cardiac surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Safety and Efficacy of opioid-sparing Anesthesia Compared with Traditional opioid-anesthesia: A Scoping Review.

Clin J Pain

November 2024

Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.

Objectives: The rationale of adoption opioid sparing anesthesia (OSA) is to achieve perioperative analgesia with a minimal amount of opioid combined to non-opioid adjuvants during and after surgery, namely multimodal anesthesia. The OSA approach was originally developed to overcome the known complications of opioid-based anesthesia (OA) and the present scoping review (ScR) aims at providing the clinical evidence of safety and efficacy of OSA with respect to OA.

Methods: This ScR is mainly focused on studies presenting evidence on the safety and efficacy of OSA versus OA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery for correction of idiopathic scoliosis is associated with chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP). In this multicenter study, we describe perioperative multimodal analgesic (MMA) management and characterize postoperative pain, disability, and quality of life over 12 months after PSF in adolescents and young adults.

Methods: Subjects (8-25 years) undergoing PSF were recruited at 6 sites in the United States between 2016 and 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Gabapentinoids, such as gabapentin and pregabalin, are opioid substitutes commonly included in perioperative multimodal analgesia regimens. We investigated whether the initiation of gabapentin and pregabalin during the perioperative period have varying effects on the adverse renal outcomes.

Methods: This study included adult participants who received surgery in the INSPIRE database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates changes in multimodal analgesia (MMA) practices in postoperative pain management, emphasizing its role in reducing opioid use amid the ongoing opioid crisis.
  • Analyzing data from 25,386 surgical procedures at six hospitals between 2017 and 2022, the research found that 46.9% of cases employed MMA, with usage increasing by an average of 3.0% per year.
  • Significant variations in MMA application were observed across different hospitals and anesthesiologists, pointing to disparities influenced by patient characteristics and procedural complexities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!