AI Article Synopsis
- - The authors identified and corrected an error in the meta-analysis, changing the classification accuracy for Serretti et al. (2007) to 64%.
- - Despite this correction, the overall results of the analysis remain consistent before and after the change.
- - The authors apologized for any inconvenience this error may have caused.
Article Abstract
The authors regret an error in one of the extracted data points in the meta-analysis. The classification accuracy for Serretti et al. (2007) was corrected to 64% (Table 3b). The overall results before and after this correction remain directionally consistent and are summarized below (Figures 2 and 3; Table 2; results subsection 3.6). The authors apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.02.037 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
corrigendum "applications
4
"applications machine
4
machine learning
4
learning algorithms
4
algorithms predict
4
predict therapeutic
4
therapeutic outcomes
4
outcomes depression
4
depression meta-analysis
4
meta-analysis systematic
4
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!