AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study focuses on improving the NemaSPEAR[%] index, used to assess pollution in sediments, by incorporating molecular techniques for identifying nematode species instead of solely relying on traditional morphological inspections.
  • - Results showed that molecular-based assessments generally indicated worse ecological conditions than morphological assessments, but there was a strong correlation at the genus level between both methods (R values of 0.86 and 0.74 for two gene fragments).
  • - To enhance this molecular approach, the researchers suggest further validation by analyzing whole meiofaunal communities and improving the reference database to address discrepancies noted at the species level.

Article Abstract

The use of bioindicator species is a widely applied approach to evaluate ecological conditions, and several indices have been designed for this purpose. To assess the impact of pollution, especially in sediments, a pollution-sensitive index based on nematodes, one of the most abundant and species-rich groups of metazoa, was developed. The NemaSPEAR[%] index in its original form relies on the morphological inspection of nematode species. The application of a morphologically based NemaSPEAR[%] at the genus-level was previously validated. The present study evaluated a NemaSPEAR[%] index based on metabarcoding of nematode communities and tested the potential of fragments from the 28S rDNA, 18S rDNA and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) genes. In general, molecular-based results tended to show a poorer condition than morphology-based results for the investigated sites. At the genus level, NemaSPEAR[%] values based on morphological data strongly correlated with those based on molecular data for both the 28S rDNA and the 18S rDNA gene fragments (R = 0.86 and R = 0.74, respectively). Within the dominant genera (>3%) identified by morphology, 68% were detected by at least one of the two ribosomal markers. At the species level, however, concordance was less pronounced, as there were several deviations of the molecular from the morphological data. These differences could mostly be attributed to shortcomings in the reference database used in the molecular-based assignments. Our pilot study shows that a molecularly based, genus-level NemaSPEAR[%] can be successfully applied to evaluate polluted sediment. Future studies need to validate this approach further, e.g. with bulk extractions of whole meiofaunal communities in order to circumvent time-consuming nematode isolation. Further database curation with abundant NemaSPEAR[%] species will also increase the applicability of this approach.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105922DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

28s rdna
8
rdna 18s
8
18s rdna
8
morphological data
8
based
6
nemaspear[%]
6
nematodes bioindicators
4
bioindicators polluted
4
polluted sediments
4
sediments metabarcoding
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!