AI Article Synopsis

  • The Prostate Cancer Outcomes (PCO) study is a multicenter initiative in Germany aimed at collecting patient-reported outcomes from men receiving local treatment for prostate cancer, as part of the Movember-funded TrueNTH Global Registry.
  • The study involves certified prostate cancer centers that gather data on patient symptoms and function before treatment and again at 12 months after treatment, with a focus on data quality and response rates across different centers.
  • As of the report's date, 44 centers have collected data on 3,094 patients, showing high recruitment rates primarily from radical prostatectomy cases, while highlighting the importance of continuous monitoring to ensure data quality in similar studies.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To give an overview of the multicenter Prostate Cancer Outcomes (PCO) study, involving paper-based and web-based collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) in patients undergoing local treatment for prostate cancer in certified centers in Germany. The PCO study is part of the larger Movember-funded TrueNTH Global Registry. The article reports on the study's design and provides a brief progress report after the first 2 years of data collection.

Methods: Prostate cancer centers (PCCs) certified according to German Cancer Society requirements were invited to participate in collecting patient-reported information on symptoms and function before and at least once (at 12 months) after treatment. The data were matched with disease and treatment information. This report describes progress in patient inclusion, response rate, and variations between centers relative to online/paper use, and also data quality, including recruitment variations relative to treatment in the first participating PCCs.

Results: PCC participation increased over time; 44 centers had transferred data for 3094 patients at the time of this report. Patient recruitment varied widely across centers. Recruitment was highest among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. The completeness of the data was good, except for comorbidity information.

Conclusions: The PCO study benefits from a quality improvement system first established over 10 years ago, requiring collection and harmonization of a predefined clinical dataset across centers. Nevertheless, establishing a PROM routine requires substantial effort on the part of providers and constant monitoring in order to achieve high-quality data. The findings reported here may be useful for guiding implementation in similar initiatives.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359206PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00224-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prostate cancer
16
patients undergoing
12
pco study
12
paper-based web-based
8
collecting patient-reported
8
patient-reported outcome
8
outcome measures
8
undergoing local
8
local treatment
8
treatment prostate
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!