AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Background: This study investigated how annual caseloads and the surgeon's previous experience influence the outcome in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCC) for acute cholecystitis.

Methods: A total of 892 patients treated in Helsinki University Hospital in 2013-2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Surgeons were compared regarding volume-over 5 LCCs for acute cholecystitis a year versus 5 or fewer LCCs a year, and experience-attendings versus residents.

Results: High-volume surgeons (n=14) operated faster than low-volume surgeons (n=62) (91 vs. 108 min, P<0.001). Examining only procedures with an attending present, high-volume attendings (n=7) converted less (14.9% vs. 32.0%, P<0.001) and operated faster (95 vs. 110 min, P<0.001) compared with low-volume attendings (n=41). The results of residents did not significantly differ from the results of attendings.

Conclusions: Attending surgeons, performing >5 LCCs for acute cholecystitis a year, have shorter operative times and lower conversion rates.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000828DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

outcome laparoscopic
8
laparoscopic cholecystectomy
8
surgeon's caseload
4
caseload affect
4
affect outcome
4
cholecystectomy acute
4
acute cholecystitis?
4
cholecystitis? background
4
background study
4
study investigated
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!