A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Effect of adaptive biofeedback on the severity of vestibulo-autonomic symptoms of experimental motion sickness]. | LitMetric

The effect of biofeedback control on motion sickness symptoms was investigated in 27 test subjects with different susceptibility who had been trained to regulate their skin resistance and skin temperature. The efficacy of two schemes was compared: scheme 1 - transfer of controlling abilities, and scheme 2 - application of biofeedback during vestibular stimulation. Use of either scheme inhibited significantly the severity of motion sickness symptoms in moderate susceptibility individuals; in other words, this decreased respiratory arrhythmia, skin galvanic response, heart rate and objective motion sickness manifestations, i.e. nausea, paleness, perspiration. This caused vestibular tolerance to increase by 50% to 150% as compared to the baseline. Biofeedback control proved ineffective in high susceptibility individuals. Scheme 2 was found to be more effective than scheme 1. Biofeedback control of skin resistance had a stronger inhibitory effect than that of skin temperature. These results suggest that the prophylactic effect of biofeedback control is associated with the regulation of a component of the complex autonomic reaction triggered as a single program during motion sickness.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

biofeedback control
16
motion sickness
16
sickness symptoms
8
skin resistance
8
skin temperature
8
susceptibility individuals
8
biofeedback
6
motion
5
skin
5
scheme
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!