A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Management of pain at arteriovenous fistula puncture: Cryotherapy versus lidocaine/prilocaine. | LitMetric

Management of pain at arteriovenous fistula puncture: Cryotherapy versus lidocaine/prilocaine.

Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl

Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Ibn Rochd University Hospital; Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Casablanca, Hassan II University, Casablanca, Morocco.

Published: June 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • Pain at AVF puncture is prevalent among hemodialysis patients, with 38% of 84 participants reporting significant discomfort.
  • The study evaluated the effectiveness of two pain relief methods: anesthetic cream (Emla™) and cryotherapy, using a visual analog scale to measure pain before and after treatment over multiple sessions.
  • Results showed both methods reduced pain, but cryotherapy was significantly more effective, suggesting it could be a better option for managing pain at AVF puncture.

Article Abstract

Pain at arteriovenous fistula (AVF) puncture is common in hemodialysis (HD) patients. The purpose of our work is to determine its frequency, to evaluate the efficiency of two techniques: anesthetic cream (Emla™) and cryotherapy, and to compare their efficiency. A prospective and interventional analytical study of HD patients was conducted in our structure. We included all patients with pain at AVF puncture. We evaluated the pain intensity using a visual analogue scale before and after our intervention: Emla™ cream during three consecutive HD sessions, then cryotherapy (ice cubes placed in latex gloves, during 5 min, directly applied on the puncture sites) during three consecutive HD sessions. The statistical analysis was performed using the Epi Info software. Eighty-four patients are undergoing HD in our structure, of which 32 (38%) report pain at AVF puncture. The mean value of the visual analog scale before the puncture was 7.19 ± 1.95 (4-10). Pain decrease was statistically significant for both techniques. Comparative analysis of the two techniques revealed a significant reduction in pain in favor of cryotherapy (P 0.001). The analgesic effect has been proved for both techniques. Cryotherapy provides higher efficiency, with fewer constraints, and could be proposed for the management of pain at AVF puncture.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-2442.289446DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

avf puncture
16
pain avf
12
management pain
8
pain arteriovenous
8
arteriovenous fistula
8
three consecutive
8
consecutive sessions
8
puncture
7
pain
7
cryotherapy
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!