AI Article Synopsis

  • Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) can indicate an undiagnosed bleeding disorder, making it crucial to assess such conditions in adolescents, though this can be challenging.
  • The study evaluated the effectiveness of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis-Bleeding Assessment Tool (ISTH-BAT) in predicting bleeding disorders among 200 adolescents referred for HMB, revealing that 33% had a diagnosed bleeding disorder.
  • Results showed that while the overall bleeding scores (BS) were higher in those with bleeding disorders, the mean scores for menorrhagia were similar; the ISTH-BAT provided modest predictive capability, suggesting a BS cut-off of >4 is more reliable for identifying bleeding disorders in this age group.

Article Abstract

Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) can be the first manifestation of an undiagnosed bleeding disorder (BD). Identifying a BD can be challenging in the adolescent age group. The utility of bleeding assessment tools (BAT) remains elusive in this population.

Aim: We evaluated the ability of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis-BAT (ISTH-BAT) in predicting a BD in adolescents referred for HMB to a multidisciplinary hematology clinic.

Methods: Two hundred adolescents with HMB underwent a standardized evaluation for BD. The clinical characteristics, laboratory data, and bleeding scores (BS) assessed using ISTH-BAT were prospectively collected. Comparisons were made between patients based on the diagnosis of BD receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses of ISTH-BAT were performed to assess its value for predicting BD.

Results: Overall, 33% (n = 67) of adolescents were diagnosed with a BD. The mean ISTH-BAT BS was higher in BD as compared to those without (4.1 versus 3.1, P < .0001), but the mean menorrhagia-specific scores did not differ (2.9 in both groups). The ISTH-BAT demonstrated a modest discriminative ability as a screening tool to identify BD in girls with HMB with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71. The ROC analysis demonstrated that with increasing BS, the sensitivity decreased, but the specificity increased. At BS = 3, sensitivity was 88%, specificity 31%, and accuracy 50%; at BS = 5, sensitivity was 37%, specificity 94%, and accuracy was 75%. There was no change thereafter.

Conclusion: In adolescents with HMB, an ISTH-BAT BS of >4 instead of the established cut-off of >2 in children is highly specific in predicting a BD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jth.14997DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bleeding disorder
8
heavy menstrual
8
menstrual bleeding
8
multidisciplinary hematology
8
bleeding
6
isth-bat
5
prospective evaluation
4
evaluation isth-bat
4
isth-bat predictor
4
predictor bleeding
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!