Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
In this work, different chemometric calibration models were developed and validated for the purpose of determining of ternary mixture of oral antidiabetic drugs; vildagliptin (VDG), saxagliptin (SAX) and sitagliptin phosphate (STG). The used models were Partial least squares (PLS) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). However, on these various models the impact of genetic algorithm (GA) as a form of variable selection was also investigated. The UV spectral data was used as basis in the quantitative study of the drugs analyzed in bulk and product formulations. The concentration range of the calibration curves of VDG, SAX and STG were 10-22 μg mL, 24-40 μg mL and 82-130 μg mL, respectively. The calibration set included nineteen mixtures and the others six were used as a validation set to test the predictability of the developed multivariate models. The validation parameters of the evaluated methods were statistically determined. For the analysis of drugs studied in laboratory-prepared mixtures and their dosage forms, PLS-1, GA-PLS-1, ANN, and GA-ENN were successfully employed. The results obtained by the developed methods were compared to those given by a reported method and there were no statistically significant differences regarding accuracy and precision.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2020.118638 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!