Present Status in Polymeric Mouthguards. A Future Area for Additive Manufacturing?

Polymers (Basel)

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Coimbra, CEMMPRE, 3030-788 Coimbra Portugal.

Published: July 2020

Athletes from contact sports are more prone to orofacial injuries because of the exposure to possible shocks and collisions derived from physical proximity. The use of protector polymeric mouthguards proved to be useful in the prevention of the described injuries. There are different types of mouthguards with varying ranges of protection and prices, but they are all made from polymers and share the same propose: to absorb and dissipate the impact energy resulting from the shocks. As they are used inside the mouth, they should not impair breathing and speaking nor compromise the comfort of the athlete. However, the ideal mouthguard is yet to be created. The choice of the most appropriate polymeric material and the standard required properties have not yet been reported. Regardless of the numerous studies in this field, normalized control parameters for both material characterization and mouthguard fabrication are absent. This paper aims to present a review of the current types of available mouthguards and their properties/characteristics. Moreover, a detailed description of the most common polymers for the fabrication of mouthguards, together with the manufacturing techniques, are discussed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7407806PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym12071490DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

polymeric mouthguards
8
types mouthguards
8
mouthguards
5
status polymeric
4
mouthguards future
4
future area
4
area additive
4
additive manufacturing?
4
manufacturing? athletes
4
athletes contact
4

Similar Publications

Objectives: The objective of this paper was to compare the effectiveness of different materials for mouthguards in preventing oral and maxillofacial injuries during sports activities. The present study compares the stress-reduction and energy absorption capabilities of two other fused filament materials - poly(lactic-acid plus) (PLA+) and polycarbonate (PC), with Ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA), which is the most commonly used material for mouthguard fabrication.

Materials And Methods: Two human skulls were modelled, and a boxing glove simulated punches along the x, y, and z-axes with 5 mm displacement with 1 kN force.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study compared custom-fit mouthguards made from conventional plaster versus 3D printed models, focusing on their thickness, fit, and shock-absorption qualities.
  • The 3D printed mouthguards demonstrated better adaptation to tooth surfaces, although both types maintained similar thickness and effectively reduced impact strain.
  • Results indicate that both types of mouthguards meet performance standards, with voids having no significant effect on their functionality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This investigation presents a critical analysis of mouthguard production, focusing on the evaluation of conventional vs additive manufacturing methods, the materials involved, and aspects such as their failure and prevention. It also summarizes the current trends, perspectives, and the main limitations. It is shown that some of the shortcomings can be solved by implementing additive manufacturing technologies, which are systematically reviewed in this research.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study compares the shock absorption performance of custom-made mouthguards produced by 3D printing, industrial methods, and thermoforming using standardized impact tests.
  • The results showed that 3D-printed mouthguards provide better shock absorption than thermoformed EVA mouthguards and have less thickness variation after repeated impacts.
  • Overall, 3D-printed mouthguards offer practical benefits for sports while being cost-effective and more durable compared to traditional mouthguard options.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The impression materials utilized today in dental medicine offer a good reproducibility and are easily accepted by patients. However, because they are polymer-based, they have issues regarding their dimensional stability. In this respect, the present work proposes a new type of dental impression, which is reinforced with rigid mouthguards.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!