Different techniques of laser lithotripsy (fragmentation, dusting, and popcorning) are commonly used during ureteroscopy. The efficiency of a single laser pulse is dependent on minimizing laser fiber-stone distance, yet it has not been reported how often the laser fiber is in contact with the stone during laser lithotripsy. In this study, we sought to measure laser fiber to stone distance using light reflectance for each technique of laser lithotripsy. Continuous light from a 660 nm (red) light-emitting diode (LED) was coupled into a 200 μm fiber using a fiber X-coupler. The LED fiber was positioned immediately next to a 242 μm holmium fiber, and both were passed through the working channel of an ureteroscope. One fiber was used to deliver laser energy to the stone, and the other fiber was used to measure distance based on light reflected from the stone back into the fiber. For fragmentation and dusting experiments, a 5 mm BegoStone was placed into a 20 mm three-dimensional printed caliceal model. For popcorn experiments, 10 BegoStones (3 × 3 × 1.5 mm) were placed in an 11 mm caliceal model and the laser fiber positioned 2 mm away from the stone surface. Data were analyzed using a MATLAB software to report fiber to stone distance at each laser pulse. With fragmentation, 52% of laser pulses were delivered when the fiber was within 0.5 mm of the stone compared to 23% and 4% for dusting and popcorning, respectively. Laser pulses delivered when fiber to stone distance was >1 mm (least effective) accounted for 34%, 48%, and >80% of total pulses during fragmentation, dusting, and popcorning, respectively. Current methods of laser lithotripsy that rely on fixed firing rates are inefficient, especially for the popcorn technique. These data highlight areas for improvement by appropriately gating pulse delivery to maximize lithotripsy effect for each pulse fired.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0298 | DOI Listing |
Background: Stone impaction is an obstacle to successful laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). This study aims to identify the incidence, operative difficulties and techniques used to disimpact and remove impacted stones during LCBDE.
Methods: Prospectively collected data from a large series of LCBDE.
BMC Anesthesiol
January 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215124, China.
Background: Intravenous anesthesia with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been reported to benefit oxygen reserves and enhance postoperative recovery in surgeries requiring low neuromuscular blockade. This study investigated whether HFNC improves recovery quality in elderly undergoing ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (UHLL).
Methods: We enrolled 106 elderly patients undergoing UHLL, with 96 patients (48 per group) included in the final analysis.
BMC Urol
December 2024
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt.
Background: Managing lower pole renal stones presents clinical challenges influenced by various factors such as stone size, location, and density. This study aims to assess the efficacy, safety, and stone-free rates of Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS), Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL), and Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (Mini PCNL) for treating lower pole renal hard stones (< 2 cm).
Methods: A prospective single-centre comparative study was conducted on 414 adult patients with primary lower pole renal hard stones.
Int J Surg
December 2024
Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of an upgraded integrated vacuum suction catheter in semi-rigid ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (VC-URSL) compared to traditional methods for treating impacted upper ureteral stones.
Patients And Methods: This prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted from September 2022 to March 2024 at a single center, enrolling 95 patients aged 18 to 70 years with a single radiopaque impacted upper ureteral stone. Participants were randomized into two groups: the VC-URSL group used an integrated vacuum suction catheter featuring a stainless steel stabilizing tube and a narrowed distal end to prevent obstruction, while the T-URSL group underwent standard ureteroscopic lithotripsy without vacuum assistance.
Urology
December 2024
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Ramathibodi Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Objectives: To investigate the effectiveness of different holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser modes for lithotripsy in the "dusting era" and identify the optimal laser mode for producing stone fragments measuring ≤0.5 mm.
Methods: We used plaster of Paris-made artificial stones crushed into 2-3 mm pieces, weighing 1 g in total.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!