Purpose: to investigate the variability of the Dichotic Sentence Test through the test and retest in normal-hearing adults.
Method: We evaluated thirty-six individuals aged 19 to 44 years old, right-handed and with normal hearing thresholds. We performed the basic audiological evaluation and then we applied the Dichotic Digit Test and Dichotic Sentence Test. The test and retest had two sessions, with an interval from 30 to 40 days, in the same shift.
Results: In the integration task, there was an advantage of the right ear in both evaluation sessions. There was no significant difference between the measures obtained in the right ear in the two evaluation sessions, while in the left ear, we found a significant difference. In the analysis of the differences in ears between the test and the retest, we found that 64% of the individuals kept the same result in the right ear, while in the left one, only 36% of the individuals kept the same result in both stages and 44% showed a 10% difference between the two evaluations. We observed moderate positive correlation for both the right ear (r=0.420) and the left ear (r=0.550), with a tendency to improve retest scores. In the separation task, there was a small variability only in the left ear, also with improved retest scores.
Conclusion: There was a significant difference between the measures obtained in the test and retest only in the integration task in the left ear, but there was a moderate positive correlation between the measures obtained in the two evaluation sessions, showing a tendency to improve scores in the second evaluation session.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20202019040 | DOI Listing |
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi
January 2025
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Air Force Medical Center, Beijing100142, China.
To simplify the Chinese version of the Visually Induced Motion Sickness Susceptibility Questionnaire (VIMSSQ), develop the simplified Chinese version of VIMSSQ, and evaluate its performance. A cross-sectional study was conducted between May and July 2023. The Chinese version of the VIMSSQ was distributed to 783 university students at North China University of Science and Technology.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Med Educ
January 2025
School of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, Scotland.
Background: Evaluating professional values is crucial to developing effective strategies for integrating them into professional performance and clinical education. A standard questionnaire is an instrument that can be used to evaluate professional values. This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Nurses Professional Values Scale-Revised (NPVS-R) among nursing students in the Persian language.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Voice
January 2025
Department of Speech and Language Therapy, School of Health Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Patras, Patras, Greece; A' ENT University Clinic, Medical School, National Kapodistreian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. Electronic address:
Objectives: The Singing Voice Handicap Index (SVHI) was culturally adapted and validated in Greek to examine the impacts of voice problems on a singer's everyday life.
Methods: The translated version was administered to 120 singers in total, along with the translated version of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI), a sort voice history questionnaire, two Self-Rating Dysphonia Severity Scales (SRDSSs), and two visual analog scales. A week after the original completion of the Greek version of SVHI, a second copy of the SVHI was administered to 50% of the participants.
Rheumatology (Oxford)
January 2025
Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Objectives: To facilitate earlier diagnosis of autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs), we aimed to 1) develop START, a novel multimedia-based symptom appraisal tool for ARDs and 2) pilot test START among established ARD cases and non-ARD controls.
Methods: We developed START using a social cognitive theory-based theoretical framework and consensus-based lists of ARDs and manifestations from our previous work. START was revised through reviews by an expert panel of rheumatologists and cognitive debriefing interviews (CDIs) with patients newly referred for assessment of ARDs.
Age Ageing
January 2025
Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Background: A mobile cognition scale for community screening in cognitive impairment with rigorous validation is in paucity. We aimed to develop a digital scale that overcame low education for community screening for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and AD.
Methods: A mobile cognitive self-assessment scale (CogSAS) was designed through the Delphi process, which is feasible for the older population with low education.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!