Introduction And Objectives: The age of heart transplant recipients and donors is progressively increasing. It is likely that not all donor-recipient age combinations have the same impact on mortality. The objective of this work was to compare survival in transplant recipients according to donor-recipient age combinations.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of transplants performed between 1 January 1993 and 31 December 2017 in the Spanish Heart Transplant Registry. Pediatric transplants, retransplants and combined transplants were excluded (6505 transplants included). Four groups were considered: a) donor <50 years for recipient <65 years; b) donor <50 years for recipient ≥ 65 years; c) donor ≥ 50 years for recipient ≥ 65 years, and d) donor ≥ 50 years for recipient <65 years.

Results: The most frequent group was young donor for young recipient (73%). There were differences in the median survival between the groups (P <.001): a) younger-younger: 12.1 years, 95%CI, 11.5-12.6; b) younger-older: 9.1 years, 95%CI, 8.0-10.5; c) older-older: 7.5 years, 95%CI, 2.8-11.0; d) older-younger: 10.5 years, 95%CI, 9.6-12.1. On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of mortality were the age of the donor and the recipient (0.008 and 0.001, respectively). The worst combinations were older-older vs younger-younger (HR, 1.57; 95%CI, 1.22-2.01; P <.001) and younger-older vs younger-younger (HR, 1.33; 95%CI, 1.12-1.58; P=.001).

Conclusions: Age (of the donor and recipient) is a relevant prognostic factor in heart transplant. The donor-recipient age combination has prognostic implications that should be identified when accepting an organ for transplant.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2020.02.016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

donor-recipient age
12
heart transplant
12
spanish heart
8
transplant registry
8
transplant recipients
8
transplant
5
impact donor-recipient
4
age
4
age cardiac
4
cardiac transplant
4

Similar Publications

Unlocking Rural Live-Kidney Donation Through Insights From a Decade-Long Analysis at a Single Center in the Northern Great Plains.

Transplant Proc

January 2025

Avera McKennan Hospital and University Health Center, Avera Medical Group Transplant & Liver Surgery, Sioux Falls, South Dakota; Department of Surgery, University of South Dakota, Sanford School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, South Dakota; Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Dakota, Sanford School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Electronic address:

Background: Data on barriers to live-kidney donation in the rural United States is limited despite its widespread adoption across the country.

Methods: A retrospective review of 1776 self-referrals for live-kidney donation between June 1, 2012, and May 31, 2022, was conducted. Multivariate analyses evaluated independent factors which may have potentially influenced donation at different stages in its process.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Continuous donor-recipient age matching in the Eurotransplant region: outcomes, parameters and prediction.

Am J Transplant

January 2025

Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address:

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Racial disparities in access to kidney transplantation (KT) have been described among children with end-stage renal disease in the United States. It has been suggested that these disparities stem from a combination of clinical and socioeconomic factors.

Methods: We evaluated data from the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) of all pediatric (< 18 years old) KT recipients from 1999 to 2014 and compared outcomes by race or ethnicity: Hispanic, non-Hispanic Whites (NHW), and non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Mismatch between osteochondral allograft (OCA) donor and recipient sex has been shown to negatively affect outcomes. This study accounts for additional donor variables and clinically relevant outcomes.

Purpose: To evaluate whether donor sex, age, donor-recipient sex mismatch, and duration of graft storage affect clinical outcomes and failure rates after knee OCA transplantation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!