A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Assessment of the respiratory muscles strength at patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with various forms of comorbidity]. | LitMetric

Unlabelled: The respiratory muscles (RM) strength is the main indicator of their functional state. However, RM strength is not used as criteria for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) stratification.

Aim: To evaluate the RM power of COPD patients with various variants of comorbidity and to determine the role of comorbidity in the development of respiratory muscle dysfunction.

Materials And Methods: RM strength of 64 men with exacerbation of COPD was studied. The severity of comorbidity was assessed by the Charlson index. Depending on the prevalence of comorbidity, patients were divided into 3 groups: cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and metabolic. Maximum inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory (MEP) pressures in the oral cavity, maximum rate of pressure development (MRPD), sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP), MEP/MIP and SNIP/MIP indexes were determined with MicroRPM device (UK). Measured values of MIP, MEP and SNIP were compared with the proper ones. The most noticeable decrease of RM strength was defined in the group of patients with severe comorbidity.

Results: In case of a mild comorbidity MEP and SNIP values were 68 and 78% of the predicted values and MIP value corresponded to the personified standard. RM strength of patients with COPD depended on the clinical variant of comorbidity. Thus, in the group of patients with cardiovascular variant of comorbidity auxiliary inspiratory muscles strength decreased. In the group of patients with cerebrovascular variant of comorbidity the expiratory muscles dysfunction predominated. In the group of patients with metabolic variant of comorbidity diaphragm dysfunction predominated.

Conclusion: The pathogenetic significance of various factors of COPD comorbidity in the development of RM dysfunction was confirmed by the results of the correlation analysis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.26442/00403660.2020.03.000239DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

group patients
16
variant comorbidity
16
muscles strength
12
comorbidity
10
respiratory muscles
8
patients
8
strength patients
8
chronic obstructive
8
obstructive pulmonary
8
pulmonary disease
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!