Unlabelled: Several approaches to the rehabilitation of agrammatism use implicit and explicit learning methods.

Objective: To verify the effect of adapted Mapping Therapy and ORLA methods (explicit versus implicit learning) on the oral and written production in spontaneous language among agrammatic patients with Broca's aphasia.

Methods: Six individuals were submitted to Mapping Therapy and ORLA (Oral Reading for Language in Aphasia) treatments. Samples of oral and written production from a picture description task were compared pre and post-treatment.

Results: In Mapping Therapy, the patients presented better performance after the training for the variables related to written production: number of words, nouns, verbs, closed-class words, and number of complete sentences. Regarding oral output, the patients had similar performance before and after the therapeutic process. In ORLA, the patients presented a significant difference before and after the therapeutic process in the variables related to oral production, increasing the number of words, number of verbs, and speech rate. There was no difference in pre and post-treatment performance in written production.

Conclusion: Both implicit and explicit learning can be used in the treatment of agrammatism. Mapping Therapy was more effective for the treatment of agrammatism in written production, while ORLA was more effective for the agrammatism in oral production.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304269PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-57642020dn14-020002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

written production
20
mapping therapy
16
treatment agrammatism
12
oral written
12
implicit explicit
12
explicit learning
12
agrammatism oral
8
patients broca's
8
therapy orla
8
patients presented
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!