Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.3849 | DOI Listing |
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol
January 2025
Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Spain.
Introduction: Suboptimal bowel preparation adversely affects colonoscopy quality, increases healthcare costs, andprolongs waiting time. The primary contributing factors include poor tolerance to the preparation solutions, noncompliance with prescribed instructions, and suboptimal efficacy of the bowel cleansing solution itself.
Areas Covered: This review examined the predictive factors associated with suboptimal bowel preparation and discussed interventions aimed at improving bowel cleansing.
Indian J Gastroenterol
January 2025
Department of Gastroenterology, Criticare Asia Multispeciality Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, 400 049, India.
Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms occur frequently in pregnant women, resulting in poor quality of life. These patients frequently require co-management with the obstetrician and a physician/GI specialist. The causation is complex and multifactorial.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFActa Gastroenterol Belg
January 2025
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second and third leading cause of cancer death in men and women respectively worldwide. Colonoscopy is the gold standard screening test to detect premalignant lesions with endoscopic polypectomy preventing evolution to CRC. Endoscopic polypectomy is effective with a higher safety profile and is less costly as compared to surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Cancer
December 2024
Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College, No. 5 Dongdansantiao Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100005, China.
Background: The colorectal cancer mortality rate in China has exceeded that in many developing countries and is expected to further increase owing to multiple factors, including the aging population. However, the optimal policy for colorectal cancer screening is unknown.
Methods: We synthesized the most up-to-date data using a 12-state Markov model populated with a cohort of Chinese men and women born during 1949-1988, and evaluated 16 conventional and 40 risk-tailored schemes for colorectal cancer screening, considering possible combinations of age (starting at 40 + years and ending at 75 years), frequency, and strategy (standard colonoscopy, fecal immunochemical testing with colonoscopy if positive, or risk-tailored).
Contemp Clin Trials
December 2024
San Francisco VA Medical Center, United States of America; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America; Measurement Science Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, San Francisco VA Healthcare System, United States of America. Electronic address:
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention is a Veterans Affairs (VA) priority. Colonoscopy quality, especially adenoma detection rate (ADR), is critical for effective screening. Our research indicates considerable variation in ADR among VA providers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!