Epidemiology and outcomes of residual neuromuscular blockade: A systematic review of observational studies.

J Clin Anesth

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA. Electronic address:

Published: November 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study highlights the importance of completely reversing neuromuscular blockade (NMB) for patient safety after surgery, as incomplete recovery can lead to complications and poor outcomes.
  • The review analyzed 58 studies with over 25,000 patients, finding inconsistent definitions and measures for residual neuromuscular blockade (rNMB), with varying incidence rates reported.
  • It concluded that patients with rNMB experienced higher rates of respiratory complications, emphasizing the need for standardized quantitative measures to evaluate rNMB in clinical practice.

Article Abstract

Objectives: Complete reversal of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) is important for patient safety and prognosis following surgical procedures involving NMB agents (NMBAs). Published evidence on the epidemiology and consequences of residual neuromuscular blockade (rNMB; incomplete neuromuscular recovery) in real-world clinical settings is lacking with advances in NMB management. Therefore, we aimed to examine the burden of rNMB and its associated clinical, economic and humanistic outcomes using a systematic review framework.

Review Methods: Electronic and conference database searches were performed to include observational studies examining rNMB or related outcomes in adults undergoing surgery and receiving NMBAs with or without NMBA antagonists.

Results: Of 1438 screened abstracts, 58 studies with 25,277 total patients were included. Inconsistent definitions of rNMB were reported across studies with 44 (76%) and 29 (50%) studies utilizing quantitative and qualitative measures to detect rNMB, respectively. The most common definition of rNMB was train-of-four ratio (TOFR) <0.9 (29 studies) and TOFR <0.7 (16 studies) measured at post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) entry. For TOFR <0.9 at PACU entry, rNMB incidence ranged from 0% to 90.5% (median 30%) overall; 0% to 16.0% in the sugammadex (SUG) group; 3.5% to 90.5% in the neostigmine (NEO) group; and 15% to 89% in the spontaneous recovery (SR) group. Twenty-one studies reported clinical outcomes (reintubation, mild hypoxemia, or a respiratory event) or resource utilization outcomes (hospital/PACU length of stay [LOS]) by presence/absence of rNMB. Patients with rNMB had higher rates of acute respiratory events compared to those without rNMB.

Conclusions: Real-world observational studies show a significant burden of rNMB and associated health sequelae, though rNMB measures were not reported consistently across studies. Appropriate quantitative measurement is needed to accurately identify rNMB, and interventions are needed to reduce its burden and associated adverse outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109962DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

neuromuscular blockade
12
residual neuromuscular
8
systematic review
8
observational studies
8
rnmb
6
studies
5
epidemiology outcomes
4
outcomes residual
4
neuromuscular
4
blockade systematic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!